This Idiot
This Idiot
Is one of the tools who was kicked out of Billingham Town for scrapping.
He also had a piss on the terraces at Spenny on Friday night.
Everyone knows your face now boy, stop being a dick every time
He also had a piss on the terraces at Spenny on Friday night.
Everyone knows your face now boy, stop being a dick every time
.
- davidcorks 40yard OG
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:44 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: This Idiot
Little young chap wanker get him banned from every game
Edit ... ch@v is now swear filtered ? young chap wtf?
Edit ... ch@v is now swear filtered ? young chap wtf?
- Free_Transfer
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Hartlepool
Re: This Idiot
I thought the bell ends who had a fight at Billy got banned??
Re: This Idiot
Never met him but he looks like a soft, chavvy scrote.
-
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:56 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: This Idiot
Am really surprised, are you sure this is the right lad? I just expected to see some kind of stereotype in the picture.
Re: This Idiot
There were a few pissed up morons near me on friday. Half the time they weren't watching the match, but occasionally decided to hurl abuse at the spenny keeper. Their idea of "banter" was to shout that they hoped he would die of aids, and how they wanted to dig up his grandmother and fuck her corpse. All shouted with bulging eyes and spittle frothing around their mouths.
Never argue with an idiot: The best possible outcome is that you win an argument with an idiot.
- fozzovmurton
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:33 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Murton, Co. Durham
- Contact:
Re: This Idiot
Theres no need for banter like that, if I was on the receiving end of that kind of abuse I would knock heads off, I like seeing a bit banter flying, but there is no need for it to turn vicious and nasty, theres a line not to cross, harmless banter is fine and can be funny, being nasty is just uncalled forLawman3 wrote:There were a few pissed up morons near me on friday. Half the time they weren't watching the match, but occasionally decided to hurl abuse at the spenny keeper. Their idea of "banter" was to shout that they hoped he would die of aids, and how they wanted to dig up his grandmother and fuck her corpse. All shouted with bulging eyes and spittle frothing around their mouths.
-
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: London
Re: This Idiot
Another fine example of what a shallow gene pool does to people
Re: This Idiot
Spot on. Theres quite a few Darlo fans that fail to engage their brains before opening their mouths or smashing ground advertising boards.Jazz Maverick wrote:Another fine example of what a shallow gene pool does to people
Re: This Idiot
You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
Re: This Idiot
He can if he saw the bloke both times, which it sounds as though he did!mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
Re: This Idiot
Correct.Hilly wrote:He can if he saw the bloke both times, which it sounds as though he did!mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
.
-
- Posts: 3664
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: On top of a 29 year old big chested woman
Re: This Idiot
I saw him pissing up the wall behind the goal too. Shocking given how many families were near him at the time. He should be banned from all home and away games.mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Last edited by DTID on Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: This Idiot
No he can't. He SAYS he saw him, but I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?Hilly wrote:He can if he saw the bloke both times, which it sounds as though he did!mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
Re: This Idiot
So 2 people have now come out and said they saw the same bloke, how many more will it take....3? 4?mobi wrote:No he can't. He SAYS he saw him, but I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?Hilly wrote:He can if he saw the bloke both times, which it sounds as though he did!mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
Re: This Idiot
The numbers are irrelevant, it is the principle. You don't post pictures on a message board and make accusations about people. This is not a court, he cannot defend himself. The moderators should remove this thread.Hilly wrote:So 2 people have now come out and said they saw the same bloke, how many more will it take....3? 4?mobi wrote:No he can't. He SAYS he saw him, but I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?Hilly wrote:He can if he saw the bloke both times, which it sounds as though he did!mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
As I said before, I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?
Re: This Idiot
It would be alright if it was true.mobi wrote:The numbers are irrelevant, it is the principle. You don't post pictures on a message board and make accusations about people. This is not a court, he cannot defend himself. The moderators should remove this thread.Hilly wrote:So 2 people have now come out and said they saw the same bloke, how many more will it take....3? 4?mobi wrote:No he can't. He SAYS he saw him, but I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?Hilly wrote:He can if he saw the bloke both times, which it sounds as though he did!mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
As I said before, I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?
Re: This Idiot
No, what SHOULD happen is for people to identify him and then it be passed to the club for action to be taken. I.e. his photo to be passed around all the stewards to ensure he's never allowed to another one of our games again.mobi wrote:The numbers are irrelevant, it is the principle. You don't post pictures on a message board and make accusations about people. This is not a court, he cannot defend himself. The moderators should remove this thread.Hilly wrote:So 2 people have now come out and said they saw the same bloke, how many more will it take....3? 4?mobi wrote:No he can't. He SAYS he saw him, but I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?Hilly wrote:He can if he saw the bloke both times, which it sounds as though he did!mobi wrote:You can't post a picture of someone and make claims about their behaviour on a public forum like this. Just consider the possibility that it wasn't him who pissed on the terraces and was thrown out. Now everyone who reads this thread will think it was, and we assume he must be guilty because he "looks the type". Not acceptable.
As I said before, I could post a picture of you and make the same claims, would that be alright?
Mobi, this lad wouldn't need to defend himself if he wasn't such a moron.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Re: This Idiot
Chuckling a bit at this one like and to be fair mobi is right. Whether the lad has done it or not, if by some unlikely coincidence he has a law degree I'm sure he'd be accusing both this site and you of slandering him. He'd then be asking for your proof to support your accusations.
I wouldn't be losing too much sleep though, I reckon you'll be alright.
I wouldn't be losing too much sleep though, I reckon you'll be alright.
-
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: London
Re: This Idiot
Exactly.m62exile wrote:Chuckling a bit at this one like and to be fair mobi is right. Whether the lad has done it or not, if by some unlikely coincidence he has a law degree I'm sure he'd be accusing both this site and you of slandering him. He'd then be asking for your proof to support your accusations.
I wouldn't be losing too much sleep though, I reckon you'll be alright.
mobi is just doing his tired old know-it-all routine.
Im pretty sure that due to his profession DL5 is aware of the risks, rules, and legalities regarding posting the picture.
Re: This Idiot
As far as I'm aware, the people who were banned are only banned from HP.
Re: This Idiot
So I take it that means it wouldn't be alright if it wasn't true? How do we establish if it is true? You only have someone's word for it.Hilly wrote:It would be alright if it was true.
Saying that it must be true "because someone said so and he looks like a scrote anyway", really isn't much of an argument. We don't want to start going down this road, forums get closed down due to this stuff.
Re: This Idiot
Say someone has a go a the lad in the picture, beats him up because they've seen this picture and heard about him. Think that isn't a problem? I'm sure you are well aware that there are a lot of thick people who read this forum, the type of people who don't think about the consequences of their actions.Jazz Maverick wrote:Exactly.m62exile wrote:Chuckling a bit at this one like and to be fair mobi is right. Whether the lad has done it or not, if by some unlikely coincidence he has a law degree I'm sure he'd be accusing both this site and you of slandering him. He'd then be asking for your proof to support your accusations.
I wouldn't be losing too much sleep though, I reckon you'll be alright.
mobi is just doing his tired old know-it-all routine.
I'm pretty sure that due to his profession DL5 is aware of the risks, rules, and legalities regarding posting the picture.
Its not a risk to DL5 posting this, its a risk to the forum.
Re: This Idiot
People are convicted in courts on the word of others, on the identification of others.
DL5 knows it is this lad, end of.
DL5 knows it is this lad, end of.
Re: This Idiot
Indeed there are mobi, indeed there are.mobi wrote:Say someone has a go a the lad in the picture, beats him up because they've seen this picture and heard about him. Think that isn't a problem? I'm sure you are well aware that there are a lot of thick people who read this forum, the type of people who don't think about the consequences of their actions.Jazz Maverick wrote:Exactly.m62exile wrote:Chuckling a bit at this one like and to be fair mobi is right. Whether the lad has done it or not, if by some unlikely coincidence he has a law degree I'm sure he'd be accusing both this site and you of slandering him. He'd then be asking for your proof to support your accusations.
I wouldn't be losing too much sleep though, I reckon you'll be alright.
mobi is just doing his tired old know-it-all routine.
I'm pretty sure that due to his profession DL5 is aware of the risks, rules, and legalities regarding posting the picture.
Its not a risk to DL5 posting this, its a risk to the forum.
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
Re: This Idiot
Yes, but you also get to hear from witnesses who may contradict the word of others. People who saw something different altogether.Quakerz wrote:People are convicted in courts on the word of others, on the identification of others.
DL5 knows it is this lad, end of.
You'd be a idiot to convict someone having only heard from the prosecution wouldn't you? I though you were smarter than that?
-
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: London
Re: This Idiot
No-ones convicting anyone or prosecuting anyone though mobi.mobi wrote:Yes, but you also get to hear from witnesses who may contradict the word of others. People who saw something different altogether.Quakerz wrote:People are convicted in courts on the word of others, on the identification of others.
DL5 knows it is this lad, end of.
You'd be a idiot to convict someone having only heard from the prosecution wouldn't you? I though you were smarter than that?
DL5 has posted a picture of someone he has seen doing this nonsense. If some idiot decides to attack him and commit GBH/ABH because of a picture on a internet site, its on their shoulders, no-one elses.
Re: This Idiot
The person who attacked him would be convicted, but they'd close the forum. You know I am right, even though it hurts.Jazz Maverick wrote:No-ones convicting anyone or prosecuting anyone though mobi.mobi wrote:Yes, but you also get to hear from witnesses who may contradict the word of others. People who saw something different altogether.Quakerz wrote:People are convicted in courts on the word of others, on the identification of others.
DL5 knows it is this lad, end of.
You'd be a idiot to convict someone having only heard from the prosecution wouldn't you? I though you were smarter than that?
DL5 has posted a picture of someone he has seen doing this nonsense. If some idiot decides to attack him and commit GBH/ABH because of a picture on a internet site, its on their shoulders, no-one elses.
Re: This Idiot
I'm smart enough to know that DL5 witnessed both incidents, that he knows who the lad is, and is fully aware of the consequences of making false allegations.mobi wrote:Yes, but you also get to hear from witnesses who may contradict the word of others. People who saw something different altogether.Quakerz wrote:People are convicted in courts on the word of others, on the identification of others.
DL5 knows it is this lad, end of.
You'd be a idiot to convict someone having only heard from the prosecution wouldn't you? I though you were smarter than that?
I don't care if there are witnesses that say this lad wasn't kicked out of Billingham, because if he was arrested then there will be records.