Darlo Uncovered

don'tbuythesun wrote:I wasn't there and presume you weren't either Shildonlad. Pretty sure this decision wasn't taken lightly. If I was subject to a ban from something I loved then I'd do everything possible to keep a low profile and not bring attention to myself. Sad to see really as I've always seen him as boisterous and enthusiastic rather than trouble.

Darlogramps wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:31 pm

don'tbuythesun wrote:I wasn't there and presume you weren't either Shildonlad. Pretty sure this decision wasn't taken lightly. If I was subject to a ban from something I loved then I'd do everything possible to keep a low profile and not bring attention to myself. Sad to see really as I've always seen him as boisterous and enthusiastic rather than trouble.

Shildonlad has form for deciding he knows best despite not seeing any of the details at all.

He didn’t believe George Reynolds did anything wrong in his recent brush with the law, despite the British judicial system finding Reynolds guilty.

Now, after reading a few comments on Facebook, he’s decided he knows best here as well.

Not saying the club are right or wrong about Andy. There are clearly multiple versions of events and I hope it gets resolved one way or another.

But given he knows nothing about what’s gone on, I find it strange why Shildonlad keeps make judgements on everything.

don'tbuythesun wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 12, 2019 11:40 am

I wasn't there and presume you weren't either Shildonlad. Pretty sure this decision wasn't taken lightly. If I was subject to a ban from something I loved then I'd do everything possible to keep a low profile and not bring attention to myself. Sad to see really as I've always seen him as boisterous and enthusiastic rather than trouble.

shildonlad wrote:

Darlogramps wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:31 pm

don'tbuythesun wrote:I wasn't there and presume you weren't either Shildonlad. Pretty sure this decision wasn't taken lightly. If I was subject to a ban from something I loved then I'd do everything possible to keep a low profile and not bring attention to myself. Sad to see really as I've always seen him as boisterous and enthusiastic rather than trouble.

Shildonlad has form for deciding he knows best despite not seeing any of the details at all.

He didn’t believe George Reynolds did anything wrong in his recent brush with the law, despite the British judicial system finding Reynolds guilty.

Now, after reading a few comments on Facebook, he’s decided he knows best here as well.

Not saying the club are right or wrong about Andy. There are clearly multiple versions of events and I hope it gets resolved one way or another.

But given he knows nothing about what’s gone on, I find it strange why Shildonlad keeps make judgements on everything.

Did i say i knew best? Was more a case of pointing out how there can be multiple versions of the same event.

Darlogramps wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 12, 2019 1:31 pm

shildonlad wrote:

Darlogramps wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:31 pm

don'tbuythesun wrote:I wasn't there and presume you weren't either Shildonlad. Pretty sure this decision wasn't taken lightly. If I was subject to a ban from something I loved then I'd do everything possible to keep a low profile and not bring attention to myself. Sad to see really as I've always seen him as boisterous and enthusiastic rather than trouble.

Shildonlad has form for deciding he knows best despite not seeing any of the details at all.

He didn’t believe George Reynolds did anything wrong in his recent brush with the law, despite the British judicial system finding Reynolds guilty.

Now, after reading a few comments on Facebook, he’s decided he knows best here as well.

Not saying the club are right or wrong about Andy. There are clearly multiple versions of events and I hope it gets resolved one way or another.

But given he knows nothing about what’s gone on, I find it strange why Shildonlad keeps make judgements on everything.

Did i say i knew best? Was more a case of pointing out how there can be multiple versions of the same event.

Yes, you did.

“from whats been said it appears the guy in question has done nothing wrong and its a over reaction.”

Maybe you worded it badly, but from that quote, you’re saying the club have over-reacted, based solely on what was posted on FB.

And like I say, you have form going off the Reynolds thread.

quakersfan wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 13, 2019 8:55 am

It’s essentially Andy Parks fault however to name him again in the statement I believe this will back fire for the club. Chris Stockdale has been arguing on the DFC Facebook page with fans which is also unseemly. This further ban should just have been given privately in my view.

EDJOHNS wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:27 pm

Don't know him at all but saw what both he and his mates said when he was banned first time round, which included him saying he was sorry and would serve whatever ban the club thought fit and learn from his mistakes.
Unless someone who has a grudge against him has deliberately lied to get him into trouble yet again what on earth was he thinking of to use ANY form of bad language yet again while serving a ban?
I see comments such as "He had had a few pints and was just "boisterous", and my mind goes into boggle mode. Surely part of the "learning from his past mistakes" was a realisation that he does not handle booze too well thus a reduction of alcohol intake would be common sense.
Hard to feel sympathy for a repeat offender, and also curious, at those complaining about the club naming him. Every time there are problems at games, people say "Name and shame". The club have done exactly that and people are having a go at them for doing as they were asked to.

HarrytheQuaker wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:41 pm

Hope you sort yourself out Andy and don't keep getting into bother..