Page 1 of 2

Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:33 pm
by Quakerz
I wonder what happened to him?

When he turned down the new contract at Spendy I thought he must have had something lined up but it doesn't seem so.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:45 pm
by LoidLucan
He's still in hiding after that splendid comedy own goal.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:57 pm
by loan_star
LoidLucan wrote:He's still in hiding after that splendid comedy own goal.
To be fair, hiding isn't something I would accuse Tait of. Acting like a knob sometimes yes, hiding no!

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 6:30 pm
by Emdubya
Tommy has a replacement lined up for Heaton :o :o

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:48 pm
by poppyfield
Would we welcome Tait back? when he played for us he did ok and I for one was sorry to see him leave , yea I know he can be a bit of a knob but the vibes obviously got to him.
I suppose the question is he good enough player now to join Darlo, would he improve the squad and would he want to take penalties :lol: ?

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 8:14 pm
by HarrytheQuaker
poppyfield wrote:Would we welcome Tait back? when he played for us he did ok and I for one was sorry to see him leave , yea I know he can be a bit of a knob but the vibes obviously got to him.
I suppose the question is he good enough player now to join Darlo, would he improve the squad and would he want to take penalties :lol: ?
NO and NO he is a badge kissing short pulling up toss pot

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:46 am
by tezza
His time has passed. Bailed out for the "Heed Shilling" at the wrong time.

Poor Joe "Always an Amateur,...never a Pro"

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:16 am
by dickdarlington
I'd take him back (on an acceptable wage). He's a very experienced players who we know is more than capable of playing at this level. That experience is something we're lacking in the squad presently. He's also no soft touch. We need a bit more grit at the back. Plus we know he can score goals with his head...oh wait.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:28 am
by QUAKERMAN2
dickdarlington wrote:I'd take him back (on an acceptable wage). He's a very experienced players who we know is more than capable of playing at this level. That experience is something we're lacking in the squad presently. He's also no soft touch. We need a bit more grit at the back. Plus we know he can score goals with his head...oh wait.
Cannot see how it would work for him financially if he came to us unless he is still employed at GAS which is Brad Groves company.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 11:35 am
by Allan Quatermain
QUAKERMAN2 wrote:
dickdarlington wrote:I'd take him back (on an acceptable wage). He's a very experienced players who we know is more than capable of playing at this level. That experience is something we're lacking in the squad presently. He's also no soft touch. We need a bit more grit at the back. Plus we know he can score goals with his head...oh wait.
Cannot see how it would work for him financially if he came to us unless he is still employed at GAS which is Brad Groves company.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
We've signed Burn from Bristol Rovers now so this is probably a moot point.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 8:07 am
by LoidLucan
Don't know what eventually happened with Tait but Bradley Fewster rejected Spendy's offer to stay if he took a wage cut and has joined Blyth.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 6:25 pm
by Darlo_CR
Guess who’s on trial for York tonight..

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 6:46 pm
by quakerman
Darlo_CR wrote:Guess who’s on trial for York tonight..


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 6:48 pm
by quakerman
Darlo_CR wrote:Guess who’s on trial for York tonight..
Whoever it is has scored for them.According to tweets, the trialist is having a good game.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 6:49 pm
by Darlo_CR
He's also just scored them, in the correct net this time.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:41 pm
by LoidLucan
Looks very much like he'll be signing.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 10:51 pm
by Darlogramps
LoidLucan wrote:Looks very much like he'll be signing.
No one cares.

Tait left us years ago, and only a handful of obsessives, who bizarrely still can't get over MG, give a stuff about York.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 6:30 am
by Vodka_Vic
I think some wanted him to sign for us.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 7:34 am
by Darlogramps
Vodka_Vic wrote:I think some wanted him to sign for us.
Except we signed Burn a few weeks back, so Tait returning was never going to happen.

It's more the case that this will be just another reason for The Obsessives to get wound up about York and MG.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:07 am
by Darlo_Pete
York are welcome to Tait, we won't improve there defensive line and it just goes to show the quality of Gray's signings.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:27 am
by Quakerz
Darlogramps wrote:
Vodka_Vic wrote:I think some wanted him to sign for us.
Except we signed Burn a few weeks back, so Tait returning was never going to happen.

It's more the case that this will be just another reason for The Obsessives to get wound up about York and MG.
You're as obsessive about the so called "obsessives", as the so called "obsessives" are about Gray.

PS Fuck Gray, I hope he fails worse than any of the biggest failures in history. Popcorn at the ready for this season, York City followed on twitter, Red and Blue Net bookmarked, bring it on.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:38 am
by tezza
Two of yesterdays men ... nothing to see here ...move on

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 9:00 am
by Darlogramps
Quakerz wrote: You're as obsessive about the so called "obsessives", as the so called "obsessives" are about Gray.
Hardly. I simply can't understand why, 10 months after his departure, people are still commenting on every move MG and York makes.
It's bemusement, not obsession.

And I'll keep expressing that opinion to The Obsessives, however much it winds you up.
Quakerz wrote: PS Fuck Gray, I hope he fails worse than any of the biggest failures in history. Popcorn at the ready for this season, York City followed on twitter, Red and Blue Net bookmarked, bring it on.
I said a few months ago MG was driving certain Darlington supporters mad. This is exactly what I'm talking about.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:34 am
by Quakerz
Darlogramps wrote:
Quakerz wrote: You're as obsessive about the so called "obsessives", as the so called "obsessives" are about Gray.
Hardly. I simply can't understand why, 10 months after his departure, people are still commenting on every move MG and York makes.
It's bemusement, not obsession.

And I'll keep expressing that opinion to The Obsessives, however much it winds you up.
LOL you think you're winding me up? I couldn't care less mate, I'm happy to be classed as an "obsessive" if that's what you want to call me because I can't stand him.

I just find it funny that you go on and on about the "obsessives" that's all. You say you're not obsessive but bemused, though...

Well I'm bemused too.

I'm bemused as to how the ferret faced fuck is still in a job when he has a full time budget in a part time league and he's lost more matches than he's won!
Darlogramps wrote:
Quakerz wrote: PS Fuck Gray, I hope he fails worse than any of the biggest failures in history. Popcorn at the ready for this season, York City followed on twitter, Red and Blue Net bookmarked, bring it on.
I said a few months ago MG was driving certain Darlington supporters mad. This is exactly what I'm talking about.
Wibble. :lol:

I don't like the bloke and to be honest I'm over egging it a little bit for fun.

However, I'll stop now because I don't want this descending into a full blown, backward and forward, dull as fuck "grampathon"

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:43 am
by AndyPark
Grampathon :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:49 am
by Darlo_Pete
Darlogramps wrote:
Vodka_Vic wrote:I think some wanted him to sign for us.
Except we signed Burn a few weeks back, so Tait returning was never going to happen.

It's more the case that this will be just another reason for The Obsessives to get wound up about York and MG.
And you weren't obsessed with getting rid of TW? :roll:

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:01 am
by Darlogramps
Quakerz wrote:
Darlogramps wrote:
Quakerz wrote: You're as obsessive about the so called "obsessives", as the so called "obsessives" are about Gray.
Hardly. I simply can't understand why, 10 months after his departure, people are still commenting on every move MG and York makes.
It's bemusement, not obsession.

And I'll keep expressing that opinion to The Obsessives, however much it winds you up.
LOL you think you're winding me up? I couldn't give a shitt mate, I'm happy to be classed as an "obsessive" if that's what you want to call me because I hate the cunnt.

I just find it funny that you go on and on about the "obsessives" that's all. You say you're not obsessive but bemused, though...
Evidently, given the nerve I've touched, you clearly do get wound up by the suggestion you're obsessed, given the level of namecalling and swearing you've sunk to.

As for your "I know you're an obsessive, but what am I?" routine, it's a bit old hat. Take an accusation and throw it back on someone. Children do it in the playground.

Sadly your MG obsession is dragging you down Q.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:03 am
by Darlogramps
Darlo_Pete wrote:
Darlogramps wrote:
Vodka_Vic wrote:I think some wanted him to sign for us.
Except we signed Burn a few weeks back, so Tait returning was never going to happen.

It's more the case that this will be just another reason for The Obsessives to get wound up about York and MG.
And you weren't obsessed with getting rid of TW? :roll:
Pete, given the weird grudges you hold against other clubs, I don't think you should be suggesting to anyone they're obsessed about anything.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:20 am
by Quakerz
Darlogramps wrote:
Quakerz wrote:
Darlogramps wrote:
Quakerz wrote: You're as obsessive about the so called "obsessives", as the so called "obsessives" are about Gray.
Hardly. I simply can't understand why, 10 months after his departure, people are still commenting on every move MG and York makes.
It's bemusement, not obsession.

And I'll keep expressing that opinion to The Obsessives, however much it winds you up.
LOL you think you're winding me up? I couldn't give a shitt mate, I'm happy to be classed as an "obsessive" if that's what you want to call me because I hate the cunnt.

I just find it funny that you go on and on about the "obsessives" that's all. You say you're not obsessive but bemused, though...
Evidently, given the nerve I've touched, you clearly do get wound up by the suggestion you're obsessed, given the level of namecalling and swearing you've sunk to.

As for your "I know you're an obsessive, but what am I?" routine, it's a bit old hat. Take an accusation and throw it back on someone. Children do it in the playground.

Sadly your MG obsession is dragging you down Q.
As it happens, I edited out some of the swearing and Gray namecalling before you even replied - because I was only doing that to exaggerate my point to you that I don't like him. I re-read it and in in hindsight I thought it a bit unneccessary - as you already know my position on him.

However, that aside, why did you feel the need to turn away from that subject and post an assumption about me "given the nerve I've touched"

Believe me, (or not) my nerves are untouched, this is nothing more than two blokes disagreeing on the internet, big deal.

And so the seed of another "grampathon" is sown, because I just know from experience that you're not going to be able to leave it at that.

Re: Joe Tait

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:25 am
by Darlogramps
Quakerz wrote:
And so the seed of another "grampathon" is sown.
You were the one who said you didn't want a long argument. You can't get involved in an argument and then complain when people reply.

Either don't respond, or don't complain when I reply to you. You can't have it both ways.