https://www.betvictor.com/en-gb/sports/ ... /0/0/0/0/0polam wrote:The Gray who is 1/4 on BetVictor is Stuart Gray. Martin Gray not in the running.
No it isn't
Martin Gray 1/4
Stuart Gray 25/1
https://www.betvictor.com/en-gb/sports/ ... /0/0/0/0/0polam wrote:The Gray who is 1/4 on BetVictor is Stuart Gray. Martin Gray not in the running.
carlodarlo wrote:That being said ever since that fans forum something has not been right with him. He created a divide between club members and fans which a manager should never do and we are still struggling from this as attendances have shown.
Darlofan97 wrote:I certainly think it was the responsibility of those putting the plans / funding in place to be clued up about the ground grading criteria, i.e. the Board & not MG.
Funny .. if you go via oddschecker it's Stuart Gray!al_quaker wrote:https://www.betvictor.com/en-gb/sports/ ... /0/0/0/0/0polam wrote:The Gray who is 1/4 on BetVictor is Stuart Gray. Martin Gray not in the running.
No it isn't
Martin Gray 1/4
Stuart Gray 25/1
That is a bit weirdpolam wrote:Funny .. if you go via oddschecker it's Stuart Gray!al_quaker wrote:https://www.betvictor.com/en-gb/sports/ ... /0/0/0/0/0polam wrote:The Gray who is 1/4 on BetVictor is Stuart Gray. Martin Gray not in the running.
No it isn't
Martin Gray 1/4
Stuart Gray 25/1
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/fo ... nt-manager
Or the other way round. Which is why this should all be taken with a pinch of salt.al_quaker wrote:That is a bit weirdpolam wrote:Funny .. if you go via oddschecker it's Stuart Gray!al_quaker wrote:https://www.betvictor.com/en-gb/sports/ ... /0/0/0/0/0polam wrote:The Gray who is 1/4 on BetVictor is Stuart Gray. Martin Gray not in the running.
No it isn't
Martin Gray 1/4
Stuart Gray 25/1
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/fo ... nt-manager
I'd imagine betvictor have their own odds correct though, and that something has gone a bit wrong when the information has been pulled through to oddschecker
Gray will deal with the tactics, recruitment, scouting, training etc. Not trawling through ground grading regulations.theoriginalfatcat wrote:Darlofan97 wrote:I certainly think it was the responsibility of those putting the plans / funding in place to be clued up about the ground grading criteria, i.e. the Board & not MG.
Yes, I would agree with that - but he's been in football all his life, he's the professional, he thinks and talks about football all day long. I'd expect him to notice a problem of this magnitude.
As I said, I still find it strange.
That's about where I am. Gray seems to be a manager who wants/needs a big budget and we're not going to be a club in that situation for some time, if ever.MKDarlo wrote:Got to agree with the above - it will be a blow to loose Gray but he may have reached as far as he can go with us. York are a full time side with a big budget and offer a vehicle for him to get closer to the football league. We cant offer that at this stage.
Perhaps it is time for a change for all parties
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
If you think MG's style of football isn't great, wait until you see Aspin's.banktopp wrote:JE93 wrote:The odds for Betvictor this morning. Interesting to see MG at such short odds. But there are definitely managers on that list who i wouldn't mind to see in our Dugout
Neil Aspin ?