may interest a few
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... are_btn_tw
Pro "If you had to choose a prospective owner you couldn’t have written a spec for Michael Eisner: he’s a businessman, philanthropic, he is involved in sport; to me it’s a no-brainer. I’m in the yes camp.”
Anti “I believe supporters should be involved in football clubs, that supporter ownership is the right way. Once it’s gone, that’s it, we will never have the chance again.”
Crossroads for Pompey
-
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:52 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:25 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Crossroads for Pompey
May also have something to do with the MLS Franchise he wants to be involved in. Owning a club in England no matter how far down the pyramid and investing in them to make them a Premier League club will only raise his profile in the states.
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Crossroads for Pompey
Or he allows "losses" at one club to reduce taxing of his profits elsewhere.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:31 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: London
Re: Crossroads for Pompey
Not this old chestnut . . .Neil Johnson wrote:Or he allows "losses" at one club to reduce taxing of his profits elsewhere.
Re: Crossroads for Pompey
*insert obligatory "Mickey Mouse club" joke here*