Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
-
- Posts: 5722
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Absolutely, we were poor yesterday and defensively shocking at times. But at the same time you can't deny that Lancaster were a lot fresher due to playing a lot less games.
Personally I think we'll look back at this result at the end of the season and be able to put it into a little bit more context. And that isn't me being a "happy-clapper" or hiding behind the fact that we were poor yesterday.
Personally I think we'll look back at this result at the end of the season and be able to put it into a little bit more context. And that isn't me being a "happy-clapper" or hiding behind the fact that we were poor yesterday.
-
- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Context is we lost a great opportunity to build momentum, profile and cash.
I don't think we done enough to win the game and got what we deserved. Don't think we need a major overhaul/discussion after that one defeat but Gray and team need to accept yesterday was poor and let the club down (potential a cup run can bring).
I personally think promotion is a step too far this season if we somehow managed it this season then we would need cash to develop the ground, something a cup run could bring in.
We will move on next Saturday, but imagine the buzz though if we had got through and drew say Halifax/or an easy game at home and tickets were on sale.
I don't think we done enough to win the game and got what we deserved. Don't think we need a major overhaul/discussion after that one defeat but Gray and team need to accept yesterday was poor and let the club down (potential a cup run can bring).
I personally think promotion is a step too far this season if we somehow managed it this season then we would need cash to develop the ground, something a cup run could bring in.
We will move on next Saturday, but imagine the buzz though if we had got through and drew say Halifax/or an easy game at home and tickets were on sale.
-
- Posts: 5722
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Perhaps context was the wrong word to use, and I'm not denying we missed out on all those things above.super_les_mcjannet wrote:Context is we lost a great opportunity to build momentum, profile and cash.
I don't think we done enough to win the game and got what we deserved. Don't think we need a major overhaul/discussion after that one defeat but Gray and team need to accept yesterday was poor and let the club down (potential a cup run can bring).
I personally think promotion is a step too far this season if we somehow managed it this season then we would need cash to develop the ground, something a cup run could bring in.
We will move on next Saturday, but imagine the buzz though if we had got through and drew say Halifax/or an easy game at home and tickets were on sale.
I was more talking about in terms of how we lost yesterday, more to it that "long ball" as some fans would have you believe.
-
- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
I have no issues with playing direct, I think the issue is we do it in occasions too often.
Brown going off yesterday stopped our whole game plan and we were too slow to change it. At half time spoke to a number of people who all said the same, so much space that Thompson/Mitchell need to be on early, well at least one.
Gray will sort it he generally does, when we are missing Burgess/Turnbull/Gillies with Thompson/Mitchell on the bench we are very average.
Brown going off yesterday stopped our whole game plan and we were too slow to change it. At half time spoke to a number of people who all said the same, so much space that Thompson/Mitchell need to be on early, well at least one.
Gray will sort it he generally does, when we are missing Burgess/Turnbull/Gillies with Thompson/Mitchell on the bench we are very average.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
The issue for me re. Injuries is that Martin can't rotate the squad when players get tired.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Spot on, Vic. Our injuries, unfortunately, came just as we needed to use the depth to freshen our legs. Thus, many of the lads have played 10+ games in little over a month. The more tired they get, the more injuries we'll end up picking up.Vodka_Vic wrote:The issue for me re. Injuries is that Martin can't rotate the squad when players get tired.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
We should also remember that it is not just the number of games but the intensity of them. The lads have had to play flat out for the full 90 minutes, often in higher than normal, energy sapping temperatures. No easy games, no spells in games when they can ease off and take breather in the way they have been used.
-
- Posts: 5722
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Rightly or wrongly this style of football has got us 3 promotions in 4 seasons. Put the ball in the right areas and put the opposition under pressure.bga wrote:This style of football (lumping it up front from the back when Beck has his back to goal) IS DEPRESSING when it clearly ISN'T working. The pitch was not awful either. You have admitted yourself we were more effective when we went wide and put proper crosses in that players could run onto! The problem today was not scoring more than one against a team 2 leagues below us.Darlofan97 wrote:I can totally understand why Beck was kept on, he's had a big impact since coming in. Yes he wasn't at his best today but he does cause a great deal of problems.
This style of football is not depressing. The pitch today was awful and the ball wasn't rolling properly, Lancaster clearly hadn't cut the grass on purpose.
Personally I HATE it when fans get on the managers back when things aren't going well and blame it on the long ball tactic, because we have always tended to play the same and we have 3 promotions in 4 seasons to show for it.
We created a fair few chances today and their goalkeeper was outstanding, we shot ourselves in the foot big time at the other end of the pitch. The problem today wasn't creating chances or our offensive play, it was our complete inability to defend.
Take FC United away for example. They could pass it around for fun between them, and they had 61% possesion if their official website is to believed. Despite FC United having the majority of possesion it was actually Darlington that had the majority of chances. Anybody there that day knew we should have been out of sight.
We created a number of chances yesterday (more than Lancaster) against a packed defence. We shot ourselves in the foot defensively with both goals and the sending off.
And yes, the pitch yesterday was awful and didn't encourage a passing game at all.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
That is the thing, our style of play works, and it entertains.Darlofan97 wrote:Rightly or wrongly this style of football has got us 3 promotions in 4 seasons. Put the ball in the right areas and put the opposition under pressure.bga wrote:This style of football (lumping it up front from the back when Beck has his back to goal) IS DEPRESSING when it clearly ISN'T working. The pitch was not awful either. You have admitted yourself we were more effective when we went wide and put proper crosses in that players could run onto! The problem today was not scoring more than one against a team 2 leagues below us.Darlofan97 wrote:I can totally understand why Beck was kept on, he's had a big impact since coming in. Yes he wasn't at his best today but he does cause a great deal of problems.
This style of football is not depressing. The pitch today was awful and the ball wasn't rolling properly, Lancaster clearly hadn't cut the grass on purpose.
Personally I HATE it when fans get on the managers back when things aren't going well and blame it on the long ball tactic, because we have always tended to play the same and we have 3 promotions in 4 seasons to show for it.
We created a fair few chances today and their goalkeeper was outstanding, we shot ourselves in the foot big time at the other end of the pitch. The problem today wasn't creating chances or our offensive play, it was our complete inability to defend.
Take FC United away for example. They could pass it around for fun between them, and they had 61% possesion if their official website is to believed. Despite FC United having the majority of possesion it was actually Darlington that had the majority of chances. Anybody there that day knew we should have been out of sight.
We created a number of chances yesterday (more than Lancaster) against a packed defence. We shot ourselves in the foot defensively with both goals and the sending off.
And yes, the pitch yesterday was awful and didn't encourage a passing game at all.
Teams set up to frustrate us and the pitches are no bowling greens. I'd much rather we play as we do, than have an impotent possession game, as England did at the Euros.
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
I too have been anxious about the tempo that I've seen games played at in this division. Players must have been worn out on Wednesday nights and then have to repeat it all on Saturdays. And I agree we do better 4-4-2 when we have the right players available. I think all of the team deserve credit for the effort they put in.dfc4me wrote:We should also remember that it is not just the number of games but the intensity of them. The lads have had to play flat out for the full 90 minutes, often in higher than normal, energy sapping temperatures. No easy games, no spells in games when they can ease off and take breather in the way they have been used.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Wasn't there yesterday so can't comment on the game although I was surprised to see that we've played twice as many league games as Lancaster so far this season.
Not excusing a poor performance but I do think our lads are knackered. it's only mid September and we've more than a quarter of the way through the season!
Not excusing a poor performance but I do think our lads are knackered. it's only mid September and we've more than a quarter of the way through the season!
-
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
We need to sort out our slow starts, we've won a few games this year by having a strong end to the game. But we can't rely on pulling back teams and we need to start games in a positive way and try and score first.
-
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Pete,
I don't know which games you've been to recently but we've had very strong starts against Nuneaton, Bradford and Lancaster but unfortunately we couldn't sustain it long enough to turn the advantage into goals.
I don't know which games you've been to recently but we've had very strong starts against Nuneaton, Bradford and Lancaster but unfortunately we couldn't sustain it long enough to turn the advantage into goals.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Totally agree, and end up hanging on to games because we are part time and having to play twice a week with key players out through injuries.Maurice_Peddelty wrote:Pete,
I don't know which games you've been to recently but we've had very strong starts against Nuneaton, Bradford and Lancaster but unfortunately we couldn't sustain it long enough to turn the advantage into goals.
As for it being " a fucking disaster" as described by Makka Pakka, I think some perspective is needed, a disappointment yes, but " a fucking disaster would be if Raj Strings was allowed to take us over again.
- Makka Pakka
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:27 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Newton Aycliffe
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
That comment was purely based on financials, not a dig at the playing side at all. I don't know the facts around our possibility to finance further ground improvements in the case of another promotion, but from my uninformed position on the outside, I had all our eggs placed firmly in this one basket. To end up without a penny from the FA cup for the second season running, I view this as a disaster. Hopefully it isn't.banktopp wrote:Totally agree, and end up hanging on to games because we are part time and having to play twice a week with key players out through injuries.Maurice_Peddelty wrote:Pete,
I don't know which games you've been to recently but we've had very strong starts against Nuneaton, Bradford and Lancaster but unfortunately we couldn't sustain it long enough to turn the advantage into goals.
As for it being " a fucking disaster" as described by Makka Pakka, I think some perspective is needed, a disappointment yes, but " a fucking disaster would be if Raj Strings was allowed to take us over again.
"At a meeting held at the Grammar School on Friday last - Mr Phillip Wood M.A., in the chair - it was resolved to form an Association Football Club for Darlington and neighbourhood. The opinions of those present were so unanimous as to the desirability of this step, that a committee was formed to complete the organisation of the club, and Mr Craven, 17, Garden Street, was appointed secretary pro tem." - The Northern Echo, Monday 23rd July 1883
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
I doubt the club will have put all their eggs in this basket. Quakerz has mentioned many a time that a promotion this season would be us performing beyond where we are in terms of size and resources.Makka Pakka wrote:I had all our eggs placed firmly in this one basket.
An FA Cup run may have almost overcome that challenge.
Surely for a disaster to happen it needs to materially affect and damage your 'status quo', this doesn't we still continue as a Conference North club. A major disappointment is a more accurate descriptive than a disaster.
- Darlobaz79
- Posts: 1168
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:17 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Lancaster got Kiddie at home in the next round....I know the numbers will have been different before you say it!
Stockport drew Salford
Stockport drew Salford
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Not sure they will have to be fair Baz as its done by region anyway at this stage. Would have been a difficult draw for us really
QuakerSam ...Once a Quaker, always a Quaker
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
I can see Harriers giving them a right old hammering in that one.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
We still have the FA Trophy to go for, Which now must have to go for to get prize money.
-
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:23 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Re the FA trophy....don't you have to win a billion games and get to the final for it to be financially worth t?
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Quick piece from saturday, most of it was wrote on the way home. However, everyone has had their say, its one of only a few blips in what has been an incredible 4/5 seasons, lets move on we are still only one point off top!
https://www.the-newshub.com/football/fa ... lo-verdict
https://www.the-newshub.com/football/fa ... lo-verdict
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Suppose we'll just have to win the FA Trophy again.
God's sake.
God's sake.
Re: Lancaster v Darlo Match Thread
Yes, but it's just about on the verge of doable to get to the final with good form, good luck and a good draw through the rounds.Comfortably_numb wrote:Re the FA trophy....don't you have to win a billion games and get to the final for it to be financially worth t?
Conf N/S clubs have reached the Trophy final occasionally before, just like Championship clubs have occasionally reached the FA Cup final.