Moles only come out at night..notgnilrad wrote:Robbie Painter wrote:Did they?notgnilrad wrote:Been told in court Wednesday, hopefully they will get their just desserts.
Will let you know my mole hasn't got back to me yet.
3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
- HarrytheQuaker
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:57 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
- theoriginalfatcat
- Posts: 6718
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
Does Spen??liddle_4_ever wrote:I don't think you know the legal system.theoriginalfatcat wrote:These cases make me chuckle - anything a little more up to date Spen ?spen666 wrote:I refer you to the cases of In R v Armagh Justices (1897) 2 Ir 57, and R v Rymer (1877) 2 QBD 136
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Profile pic
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
Well the Law Society thinks I do as do the government who employ me as a solicitor.theoriginalfatcat wrote: ...
Does Spen??
So I get paid out of your taxes- thanks very much
Try doing your own research http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
Fuck off spenspen666 wrote:Well the Law Society thinks I do as do the government who employ me as a solicitor.theoriginalfatcat wrote: ...
Does Spen??
So I get paid out of your taxes- thanks very much
Try doing your own research http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/
Think before posting
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
It doesn't follow necessarily that being on the Roll means you know the legal system. I know several solicitors who know little of the areas in which they practice.spen666 wrote:Well the Law Society thinks I do as do the government who employ me as a solicitor.theoriginalfatcat wrote: ...
Does Spen??
So I get paid out of your taxes- thanks very much
Try doing your own research http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/
Never argue with an idiot: The best possible outcome is that you win an argument with an idiot.
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
Just like to reiterate loan stars point. The club can ban anybody they like for no reason. How do I know this? Personal experience. And the. When my brother was being ejected from the arena he refused to leave as he had done nothing wrong. The police told him that it didn't matter, it was a private club and the owner can refuse entry to anybody he likes for no reason.Darlogramps wrote:There's always a pedant. The point I was making is that there must be a sufficient reason to ban an individual, otherwise there could be recourse from those who've had action taken against them.loan_star wrote:DFC can bar whoever they want for any reason they want. It is a private club and they can deny admission if they choose to. Yes we don't want to go down the Reynolds route but if someone is due in court for offences relating to their support of DFC then the club have every right to deny admission.Darlogramps wrote: A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.
Obviously if a "supporter" has committed an offence, that is sufficient justification for a ban.
But the more general point, that a club can ban who it likes for what it likes, is far too simplistic.
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
what happens now then if said person was a share holder?
-
- Posts: 956
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
Nothing - being a shareholder doesn't bring with it any special rights of access to premises except to attend the annual general meetingdarlodaz wrote:what happens now then if said person was a share holder?
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:50 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...
Apologies for getting back to the subject of this thread but does anybody know if a court hearing has taken place and / or whether the alleged miscreants have been identified?