bbc cameras
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 4:20 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
bbc cameras
I hope the club are receiving a fee from the bbc for allowing them to film their documentary about Salford at our home game.
Re: bbc cameras
What about each one of the crowd demanding to be paid as extras then donating the proceeds to Back to Darlo fund? If you can't photo your own bairns in the school play without permission and contravening the Data Protection Act, then surely BBC should cough up a fee??
Re: bbc cameras
One can only try for a fee ,but it's the BBC and we all know how they work ,cover ups and the like,so I'd say no chance.Would like to see it happen though.
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Adding this to my list of onewayup's most nonsensical posts.onewayup wrote:One can only try for a fee ,but it's the BBC and we all know how they work ,cover ups and the like,so I'd say no chance.Would like to see it happen though.
There's quite a lot to choose from.
-
- Posts: 3664
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: On top of a 29 year old big chested woman
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Nope, I'm just calling out nonsense where I see it. Doesn't make me grumpy at all.Fatty eats roadkill wrote:You're a right grumpy git these days.
Don't tell me you agree that the BBC should be forced to pay to do their work?
What have meadowlark and onewayup got against the Beeb anyway? Why are they singling them out? Why not get Stod and Ray Simpson, or DarloFansRadio to cough up on entry too?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 12:45 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Fee? It's free advertising for the club?
Give over
Give over
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
I too would like some money from the BBC.
-
- Posts: 3664
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: On top of a 29 year old big chested woman
Re: bbc cameras
I've never been fondled by a bbc person and I'm dead good looking! I feel cheated and therefore I demand compensation from the bbc!
Waiting for Raj to shaft them!
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 4:20 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Luckily I am in a good mood tonight, but I have two comments for darlogramps.
First, read my original post again and ask yourself where I said I have got it in for the BBC.
Second, if you don't understand the difference between craig stoddart, ray simpson and others reporting on darlo games for darlo fans, and BBC tv filming a darlo game for a documentary about Salford, then there is not much I can say about that.
Finally, one general comment for anyone else. I didn't say the BBC should be forced to make a payment, I just said I hoped we got a fee.
End of story.
First, read my original post again and ask yourself where I said I have got it in for the BBC.
Second, if you don't understand the difference between craig stoddart, ray simpson and others reporting on darlo games for darlo fans, and BBC tv filming a darlo game for a documentary about Salford, then there is not much I can say about that.
Finally, one general comment for anyone else. I didn't say the BBC should be forced to make a payment, I just said I hoped we got a fee.
End of story.
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Well you're wanting them to pay us money to do their job, for a reason you haven't explained. So if you don't have a reason, it can only be some sort of issue with the BBC.meadowlark wrote:Luckily I am in a good mood tonight, but I have two comments for darlogramps.
First, read my original post again and ask yourself where I said I have got it in for the BBC.
I fully understand the difference in who's reporting on who, but my point is you haven't explained why one group is worthy of getting in for free, while another has to pay, purely because they're not reporting on us. It makes you sound bitter and jealous that Salford are getting attention and we're not.meadowlark wrote:Second, if you don't understand the difference between craig stoddart, ray simpson and others reporting on darlo games for darlo fans, and BBC tv filming a darlo game for a documentary about Salford, then there is not much I can say about that.
What about if it was a reporter from a North West newspaper doing a match report on Salford? Should they also pay because they're not reporting on Darlo?
I'm loving this welcoming attitude you have to everyone who's trying to promote non-league football.
You can try and deflect over semantics all night long, but you want the BBC to pay to do their work. That's what we're discussing here. If someone stood outside your place of work and asked you to pay to get in, I doubt you'd be too pleased about that.meadowlark wrote:Finally, one general comment for anyone else. I didn't say the BBC should be forced to make a payment, I just said I hoped we got a fee.
End of story.
In two posts you've not offered a reason for your assertion, which is very bizarre and indicates you don't actually believe in what you're saying. If you actually offer an explanation for why the BBC should pay to get in, perhaps we'll get somewhere.
Let me ask you this, if the BBC were making a documentary about us, would you be saying that they should pay to get in?
-
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Never saw the cameras last night, although I heard they followed in the Salford team, along with Salford's ghetto blaster.
Re: bbc cameras
Darlogramps, you really are a grumpy old git ,the post is obviously tounge in cheek. Instead of criticisms of others posts,why don't you post something positively of your own .
Re: bbc cameras
They are gaining footage of our team. Which we pay to see and our club pays to play. Salford will be receiving money too. To say 'you want the bbc to pay to do their work' is an odd one. I mean yes, like they pay for all their access to potential footage so they can justify the licence fee? Hardly the same as me paying just to 'do my job'.
I dont agree with the initial point but I dont see why you're arguing agaisnt the beeb 'paying to do their job'. They would be paying for a product they are using.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
I dont agree with the initial point but I dont see why you're arguing agaisnt the beeb 'paying to do their job'. They would be paying for a product they are using.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Re: bbc cameras
Also pete, there was a big fucking drone flying around with green and red lights off it. What do you mean you didnt see the cameras?
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Never saw the drone, I was in the tinshed so it did obscure my view of the night sky & I probably didn't think one would be flying at night as well.TDS wrote:Also pete, there was a big fucking drone flying around with green and red lights off it. What do you mean you didnt see the cameras?
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Darlo_Pete wrote:Never saw the drone, I was in the tinshed so it did obscure my view of the night sky & I probably didn't think one would be flying at night as well.TDS wrote:Also pete, there was a big fucking drone flying around with green and red lights off it. What do you mean you didnt see the cameras?
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
TDS, Thanks for attempting a coherent explanation, although unsurprisingly, I disagree with you on a few points.
And I think we'd be in danger of doing damage to our reputation if people are suggesting media who don't regularly cover us should pay for "the product" of the game.
Surely you can use this same argument for the Northern Echo or DarloFansRadio, or whoever else covers Darlo. They too would be coming to "use a product" so why do they get in free, but the BBC documentary makers have to pay? That's inconsistent and double-standards.TDS wrote: I dont agree with the initial point but I dont see why you're arguing agaisnt the beeb 'paying to do their job'. They would be paying for a product they are using.
And I think we'd be in danger of doing damage to our reputation if people are suggesting media who don't regularly cover us should pay for "the product" of the game.
With the greatest respect, I don't understand what point you're making here. That you don't believe the BBC paying a fee to us to film last night's game would be "paying to do their work"? And the OP quite clearly states he wants the BBC to have paid us money to film last night's game. That's a pretty clear definition of wanting them to pay to work.TDS wrote:They are gaining footage of our team. Which we pay to see and our club pays to play. Salford will be receiving money too. To say 'you want the bbc to pay to do their work' is an odd one.
I mean yes, like they pay for all their access to potential footage so they can justify the licence fee?
Last edited by Darlogramps on Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Ha - you've been challenged and now all of a sudden your post was an attempt at humour. Whatever you say. Stop back-pedalling and actually defend your post.onewayup wrote:Darlogramps, you really are a grumpy old git ,the post is obviously tounge in cheek.
And also, if you're going to sink to the level of throwing insults, at least come up with original ones, rather repeating ones from earlier in the thread.
I post plenty of positive things about the club (check my post history if you want). But I enjoy challenging people who come up with nonsensical views.onewayup wrote: Instead of criticisms of others posts,why don't you post something positively of your own .
It speaks volumes that you've attempted to insult me, rather than stick up for your original post.
Re: bbc cameras
Darlogramps, Pathetic, I,ll not quantify.
- theoriginalfatcat
- Posts: 6717
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Without getting drawn into an argument, I think it's quite fair to request a small fee from the BBC. In fact they probably have a set fee ready to be offered in occasions such as this.
They're not doing us any favours -they're making (yet another) documentary about $alford - not us, and using our car park/electric/other facilities.
They pay to film MOTD and other games, so why not us ?
They're not doing us any favours -they're making (yet another) documentary about $alford - not us, and using our car park/electric/other facilities.
They pay to film MOTD and other games, so why not us ?
Profile pic
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
Re: bbc cameras
The Echo and fans radio etc are reporting on the game, they are not making a documentary, thats the difference, and its a big one.Darlogramps wrote:TDS, Thanks for attempting a coherent explanation, although unsurprisingly, I disagree with you on a few points.
Surely you can use this same argument for the Northern Echo or DarloFansRadio, or whoever else covers Darlo. They too would be coming to "use a product" so why do they get in free, but the BBC documentary makers have to pay? That's inconsistent and double-standards.TDS wrote: I dont agree with the initial point but I dont see why you're arguing agaisnt the beeb 'paying to do their job'. They would be paying for a product they are using.
.
I'm not saying the BBC shouldnt be allowed, or should have to pay, but they are doing more than creating a match report, so the comparison isnt valid.
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
The BBC pay for s*** all the time, so to say they "shouldn't have to pay for doing their job" is a nonsense argument as it's misrepresenting what we're talking about and creating false analogies.
They'll be paying Salford, they pay people who appear in documentaries, they pay for permission to use footage, and they legally have to gain permission for anything they put into a documentary which often incurs a fee (or in other words, paying people for s***).
As Shawry mentioned, if the Echo or whoever were doing a documentary then yes, the same rules would apply to them, but your comparison is flawed as it isn't like for like.
They'll be paying Salford, they pay people who appear in documentaries, they pay for permission to use footage, and they legally have to gain permission for anything they put into a documentary which often incurs a fee (or in other words, paying people for s***).
As Shawry mentioned, if the Echo or whoever were doing a documentary then yes, the same rules would apply to them, but your comparison is flawed as it isn't like for like.
-
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:53 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
I doubt there is going to be much appetite for this documentary anymore (have to admit the first series was good) with Gigg's at Man U, the Nevilles at Valencia, Butt is at Man U.
Now Salford will just be another non league club with the owners having a fleeting interest in the club.
It will probably focus on the few games when the class of 92 actually attend, which will be very little.
However, it will be a good advert for non league football.
Now Salford will just be another non league club with the owners having a fleeting interest in the club.
It will probably focus on the few games when the class of 92 actually attend, which will be very little.
However, it will be a good advert for non league football.
“If you can't hit a driver, don't.”
Greg Norman
Greg Norman
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
I disagree. It's not a big difference in my opinion. They are still media at the ground, creating a product around non-league football and the game.shawry wrote:The Echo and fans radio etc are reporting on the game, they are not making a documentary, thats the difference, and its a big one.Darlogramps wrote:TDS, Thanks for attempting a coherent explanation, although unsurprisingly, I disagree with you on a few points.
Surely you can use this same argument for the Northern Echo or DarloFansRadio, or whoever else covers Darlo. They too would be coming to "use a product" so why do they get in free, but the BBC documentary makers have to pay? That's inconsistent and double-standards.TDS wrote: I dont agree with the initial point but I dont see why you're arguing agaisnt the beeb 'paying to do their job'. They would be paying for a product they are using.
.
I'm not saying the BBC shouldnt be allowed, or should have to pay, but they are doing more than creating a match report, so the comparison isnt valid.
I don't think that's a "big" difference at all.
And this match will, in all likelihood, feature for a minute or two at most in the documentary. It's not as if the full documentary is based on this one match.
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
Because you're incapable of doing so.onewayup wrote:Darlogramps, Pathetic, I,ll not quantify.
Again, you've offered no explanation for your argument. Instead you've thrown a very mild insult at someone who has challenged you.
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: bbc cameras
The problem you've got is you're starting with a faulty comparison based on the fact that they're all "journalists" or "the media", which means you're ending up with a facile argument based on this faulty comparison.Darlogramps wrote:I disagree. It's not a big difference in my opinion. They are still media at the ground, creating a product around non-league football and the game.
I don't think that's a "big" difference at all.
And this match will, in all likelihood, feature for a minute or two at most in the documentary. It's not as if the full documentary is based on this one match.
The big difference here is the fact that the BBC are making a television show, not a match report, and that is a big difference whether you want to admit it or not. Hence, a lot more money is involved and there are extra permissions involved too: they have to get permission for anything they use.
So to say "they shouldn't have to pay to do their job" is facile as according to the law that's exactly what they have to do in this instance (making a documentary). And comparing what they're doing to what another journalist or media outlet is doing is facile too as you're not comparing like for like (just because they've got similar jobs doesn't mean that everything involved in their respective jobs is identical).
- Mr_Tibbs
- Posts: 3293
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
- Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
- Location: Gruzia
- Contact:
Re: bbc cameras
There's also a further distinction to be made about Fans Radio as this the club's officially sanctioned Fans Group who are helping the club to engage fans far and wide. It's on a par with Kev shooting the video but, to make that comparison a little closer, the video highlights are sponsored and I think we should try and think of ways to monetise the commentary (read out sponsors names or something) to help offset any impact the service may have on our home crowds. Hopefully the new Commercial Team can look at this as potential revenue stream for next season.
With the Echo the club have probably issued local reporters with a press pass since Adam was a lad, as they rely on them to reach those parts of the local community that the club can't reach - also the Echo's Chief Editor sits on the DFC Advisory Board (or he did last time I looked) so we're all pulling in the same direction... a good team sells more papers which draws more fans in.
As for the BBC making a TV Show at our expense - I'm sure permission will have been sought and granted, and whether any money changed hands will probably show in the accounts but I think it's all good publicity for the club (and we won!). So long as they just call us "Darlington" when they broadcast it would be good enough for me.
With the Echo the club have probably issued local reporters with a press pass since Adam was a lad, as they rely on them to reach those parts of the local community that the club can't reach - also the Echo's Chief Editor sits on the DFC Advisory Board (or he did last time I looked) so we're all pulling in the same direction... a good team sells more papers which draws more fans in.
As for the BBC making a TV Show at our expense - I'm sure permission will have been sought and granted, and whether any money changed hands will probably show in the accounts but I think it's all good publicity for the club (and we won!). So long as they just call us "Darlington" when they broadcast it would be good enough for me.
Join - Shop - Collect
Collect free donations for your club every time you shop the easyfundraising way:
www.easyfundraising.org.uk/causes/dfcsg
Collect free donations for your club every time you shop the easyfundraising way:
www.easyfundraising.org.uk/causes/dfcsg