Dan Burn

norwich darlo · Post by **norwich darlo** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:16 pm

Sheffield United are after Dan 3rd offer. Are we on for any more cash? if so the timing could not be better.

divas · Post by **divas** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:29 pm

Keep everything crossed.

JE93 · Post by **JE93** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:52 pm

Might just be rumor mill but I think the percentage of any sale of Burn that we retained was around the 9% mark

poppyfield · Post by **poppyfield** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:06 pm

Read this.

http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/spo ... -1-7660258

lo36789 · Post by **lo36789** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:44 am

Hummmm will sheff United stump up enough cash for Fulham to make a profit? Didn't they pay £400k for Burn anyway - wouldn't we only get 9% of anything above that?

Neil Johnson · Post by **Neil Johnson** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:21 am

lo36789 wrote:Hummmm will sheff United stump up enough cash for Fulham to make a profit? Didn't they pay £400k for Burn anyway - wouldn't we only get 9% of anything above that?

Any cash would be most welcome with the present situation.

lo36789 · Post by **lo36789** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:20 am

Indeed - any money. Depending on how terms are laid out he could be sold for £400k and we get nothing. If we get 9% of transfer fee regardless that almost wiped out our annual shortfall - so it's quite a pertinent point!

joejaques · Post by **joejaques** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:33 am

If it's a third bid, they're not going to be offering 30 bob.

m62exile · Post by **m62exile** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:47 am

I think he is in the final year of his contract now so hard to see us receiving anything beyond the January window.

JE93 · Post by **JE93** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:12 pm

If he moved for any money at all I think we would still.be in for some kind of solidarity payment as we were involved in the training of Burn up until he was 18 or 19

divas · Post by **divas** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 1:05 pm

JE93 wrote:If he moved for any money at all I think we would still.be in for some kind of solidarity payment as we were involved in the training of Burn up until he was 18 or 19

I *think* the solidarity payment would only be applicable if Burn moved across the border.

jjljks · Post by **jjljks** » Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:16 pm

DB playing today at Sheff Wednesday. Hope he plays well and United have some people watching so that he can impress. Trouble is that Hillsborough is probably a place they wouldn't want to be seen at!

quakersam · Post by **quakersam** » Sun Jan 10, 2016 10:36 pm

3rd bid reported to have been made

Journalist tweet :
@FulhamFC defender Dan Burn wanted by @SUFC_tweets. Rated at £1m. Expect this to happen before the end of the month

theoriginalfatcat · Post by **theoriginalfatcat** » Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:26 pm

quakersam wrote:3rd bid reported to have been made

Mr Singh reported to be shuffling paperwork around.

meadowlark · Post by **meadowlark** » Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:15 pm

Voted man of the match at sheffield wednesday by fulham fans. Could strengthen fulham resolve to keep him.

Darlo_Pete · Post by **Darlo_Pete** » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:22 pm

meadowlark wrote:Voted man of the match at sheffield wednesday by fulham fans. Could strengthen fulham resolve to keep him.

So that'll be 6 fans who could have voted.

lo36789 · Post by **lo36789** » Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:29 pm

quakersam wrote:3rd bid reported to have been made

Journalist tweet :
@FulhamFC defender Dan Burn wanted by @SUFC_tweets. Rated at £1m. Expect this to happen before the end of the month

Clearly it is just journalist talk but I am surprised about that. With him being in last year of his contract I expected a measly fee. If he went for that it would be Dan Burn saving DFC once again!

Darlo_Pete · Post by **Darlo_Pete** » Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:04 pm

We'd have to name the ground after him, as a thank you!

AndyPark · Post by **AndyPark** » Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:13 pm

footifan · Post by **footifan** » Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:56 pm

Darlo_Pete wrote:We'd have to name the ground after him, as a thank you!

He has already had a pub named after him... What more do you want

BUSHEAD · Post by **BUSHEAD** » Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:25 am

We could have a Burns night on Monday 25th January

joejaques · Post by **joejaques** » Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:48 am

As long as there isn't a burn running by the pitch at BM. We've had enough waterlogging thanks.

Mr_Tibbs · Post by **Mr_Tibbs** » Tue Jan 12, 2016 1:24 pm

footifan wrote:
Darlo_Pete wrote:We'd have to name the ground after him, as a thank you!
He has already had a pub named after him... What more do you want

Thought we were going to name it the Stad de Chris, or something like that?

footifan · Post by **footifan** » Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:15 pm

Mr_Tibbs wrote:
footifan wrote:
Darlo_Pete wrote:We'd have to name the ground after him, as a thank you!
He has already had a pub named after him... What more do you want
Thought we were going to name it the Stad de Chris, or something like that?

Oh bugger... Maybe I should by 3 tickets ? LOL

tezza · Post by **tezza** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 2:31 pm

Not exactly what we wanted to hear, see below. MoM Saturday. Talk previous week of £900k fee.

With the 27 year old set to sign for the West London club, it is believed that Fulham Manager Slavisa Jokanovic is now looking to trim his squad with defenders Dan Burn and Shaun Hutchinson possibly leaving the club on loan deals.

Former Darlington defender Burn is understood to be wanted by League 1 club Sheffield United who are looking to bolster their promotion push. Blades Manager Nigel Adkins has seen bids for the big centre half rejected last summer but it is understood that Fulham could be willing to loan the player out now that a suitable replacement has been found.

m62exile · Post by **m62exile** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:52 pm

tezza wrote:Not exactly what we wanted to hear, see below. MoM Saturday. Talk previous week of £900k fee.

With the 27 year old set to sign for the West London club, it is believed that Fulham Manager Slavisa Jokanovic is now looking to trim his squad with defenders Dan Burn and Shaun Hutchinson possibly leaving the club on loan deals.

Former Darlington defender Burn is understood to be wanted by League 1 club Sheffield United who are looking to bolster their promotion push. Blades Manager Nigel Adkins has seen bids for the big centre half rejected last summer but it is understood that Fulham could be willing to loan the player out now that a suitable replacement has been found.

I can't understand why they would loan him out and turn down 900k seeing as he's out of contract at the end of the season? If he was surplus to requirements surely they'd accept a fee rather than let him go for nothing...

Darlo_Pete · Post by **Darlo_Pete** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:51 pm

It doesn't make sense for Fulham to get rid of arguably their best defender to another club on loan.

don'tbuythesun · Post by **don'tbuythesun** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:56 am

Sheffield telegraph talking about a fourth bid!

tezza · Post by **tezza** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:02 pm

Mixed messages coming out of Fulham. Its hard to grasp any logic as to why they would consider letting him go, even less on loan. See below from a fan

"It is very pleasing to see Jokanovic keep faith in towering defender Dan Burn who has been an ever-present since he took over. Burn has always impressed me since making his debut under Rene Meulensteen and I believed he should have been the first name on the team sheet in recent seasons. With a run of games we are starting to see the best of the Burn.

He was man of the match against Hull with his no nonsense approach to defending, Burn cleaned up on numerous times and made a number of important tackles to prevent Abel Hernandez from leading a counter attack"

I wonder if he is unsettled ?

tezza · Post by **tezza** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:16 pm

For what it is worth, Fulham just announced that they will NOT be selling Dembele or McCormack During the transfer window.

Given their transfer embargo that probably makes it a little more likely of a deal for Burn. ?

Interesting between now and 11am Monday.

Darlo Uncovered

Dan Burn

Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn

Re: Dan Burn