Dan Burn

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

Darlofan97
Posts: 5690
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Darlofan97 » Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:50 pm


User avatar
divas
Posts: 13213
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by divas » Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:09 pm

@Danburn3 is set for a @SUFC_tweets move after a fourth bid has been accepted, this is set to be announced by the club before Saturday.

User avatar
theoriginalfatcat
Posts: 6718
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by theoriginalfatcat » Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:25 pm

So, the burning question must be - do we definitely get a windfall??
Profile pic ↗️
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!

Beano
Posts: 1461
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:33 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Beano » Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:43 pm

It would be very helpful!

jjljks
Posts: 3015
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 10:25 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by jjljks » Thu Jan 28, 2016 10:36 pm

Absolutely no mention of any move on http://www.footballwhispers.com/teams/fulham

User avatar
Spyman
Posts: 12644
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Spyman » Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:49 am

tezza wrote:For what it is worth, Fulham just announced that they will NOT be selling Dembele or McCormack During the transfer window.

Given their transfer embargo that probably makes it a little more likely of a deal for Burn. ?

Interesting between now and 11am Monday.
For what it's worth, Dembele appears to be off to Spurs.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.

We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.

Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.

DC

onewayup
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by onewayup » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:21 am

Wolves,just sign williamson from Newcastle, maybe now the Burn move on with sheff utd now.fingers crossed,and Darlington benefit.

User avatar
D_F_C
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:43 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by D_F_C » Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:25 pm

onewayup wrote:Wolves,just sign williamson from Newcastle, maybe now the Burn move on with sheff utd now.fingers crossed,and Darlington benefit.
little bit puzzled about what Williamson has to do with it. Unless I'm missing something

tezza
Posts: 1005
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:25 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington
Contact:

Re: Dan Burn

Post by tezza » Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:28 pm

D_F_C wrote:
onewayup wrote:Wolves,just sign williamson from Newcastle, maybe now the Burn move on with sheff utd now.fingers crossed,and Darlington benefit.
little bit puzzled about what Williamson has to do with it. Unless I'm missing something

Likewis

User avatar
HarrytheQuaker
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:57 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by HarrytheQuaker » Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:48 pm

onewayup wrote:Wolves,just sign williamson from Newcastle, maybe now the Burn move on with sheff utd now.fingers crossed,and Darlington benefit.
Please explain ur logic???? Baffled.com


Sat ont shitter

lo36789
Posts: 10931
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by lo36789 » Fri Jan 29, 2016 3:11 pm

if somebody is willing to part with cash for Mike Williamson then surely there is a market for Dan Burn...?

meadowlark
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 4:20 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by meadowlark » Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:08 pm

I think Fulham have been linked with a centre back from Wolves, so now that Wolves have signed mike williamson there could be a domino effect resulting in Burn moving.

User avatar
divas
Posts: 13213
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by divas » Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:42 pm

Fulham already signed a new defender

onewayup
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by onewayup » Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:10 pm

Still think burn Will move to sheff utd , before transfer window closes,meadowlark has my thinking spot on.

User avatar
RUMPLESTILTSKIN
Posts: 1688
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:57 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: In my own little world

Re: Dan Burn

Post by RUMPLESTILTSKIN » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:01 pm

I am still not sure that we are due anything. Are we not the club that sold him anymore, according to the FA.
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is King

Emdubya
Posts: 1118
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:31 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Emdubya » Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:26 pm

RUMPLESTILTSKIN wrote:I am still not sure that we are due anything. Are we not the club that sold him anymore, according to the FA.
Going by that logic we shouldn't have had appearance payments either then. :roll:

User avatar
bigrichiet
Posts: 323
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:07 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by bigrichiet » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:09 pm

Honestly man. You's have all been so bothered about this that you've had endless discussions about will he won't he and actually no one even knows if we get any sell on when we are part of the most openly run Darlo FC set up that has ever existed.

If you're that bothered just email Dave Mills and ask

lo36789
Posts: 10931
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by lo36789 » Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:59 pm

bigrichiet wrote:no one even knows if we get any sell on
Everyone does know there is an 18% clause in there of which we get 50% of it. Just not sure if it is on profit or on overall transfer fee.

We also know as it was clearly stated that it is commercially sensitive information. Why would anyone e-mail Dave Mills when it was made abundantly clear when we first got Burn money that Fulham wouldn't allow any further details to be made public.

dickdarlington
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:12 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by dickdarlington » Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:12 pm

Is Dan Burn the last of the sell on clauses? I.e. Will the R** S**** era finally be liquidated?

lo36789
Posts: 10931
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by lo36789 » Sat Jan 30, 2016 8:03 am

The last 'official' one. I do have a theory though - what if Charlton and potentially Fulham have future clauses themselves on Smith/Burn. In theory we are entitled to 9% of those clauses if they materialise.

I wonder though if he is sold we approach the liquidator and give them say £500 for the remaining 9% just to close down all of their current and future assets.

Chances are it is £500 just to absolutely close down that company for good and I dunno...free up a certain name. The last creditors report suggested the final liquidators report would be coming out pretty soon after Burn's contract expires (coincidence?), so perhaps a transfer would be the final nail.

Neil Johnson
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Neil Johnson » Sat Jan 30, 2016 11:04 am

lo36789 wrote:The last 'official' one. I do have a theory though - what if Charlton and potentially Fulham have future clauses themselves on Smith/Burn. In theory we are entitled to 9% of those clauses if they materialise.

I wonder though if he is sold we approach the liquidator and give them say £500 for the remaining 9% just to close down all of their current and future assets.

Chances are it is £500 just to absolutely close down that company for good and I dunno...free up a certain name. The last creditors report suggested the final liquidators report would be coming out pretty soon after Burn's contract expires (coincidence?), so perhaps a transfer would be the final nail.
It would be good to stop paying the liquidators (directly or indirectly)

User avatar
Mr_Tibbs
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
Location: Gruzia
Contact:

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Mr_Tibbs » Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:52 pm

Neil Johnson wrote:
lo36789 wrote:The last 'official' one. I do have a theory though - what if Charlton and potentially Fulham have future clauses themselves on Smith/Burn. In theory we are entitled to 9% of those clauses if they materialise.

I wonder though if he is sold we approach the liquidator and give them say £500 for the remaining 9% just to close down all of their current and future assets.

Chances are it is £500 just to absolutely close down that company for good and I dunno...free up a certain name. The last creditors report suggested the final liquidators report would be coming out pretty soon after Burn's contract expires (coincidence?), so perhaps a transfer would be the final nail.
It would be good to stop paying the liquidators (directly or indirectly)
"Administrators" - liquidators makes it sound like the club was liquidated, but it wasn't... we're still the same club just, temporarily, with a different name.
Join - Shop - Collect

Collect free donations for your club every time you shop the easyfundraising way:

Image

www.easyfundraising.org.uk/causes/dfcsg

onewayup
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by onewayup » Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:16 pm

Well said mr tibbs

tezza
Posts: 1005
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:25 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington
Contact:

Re: Dan Burn

Post by tezza » Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:45 am

Senior figures at Bramall Lane remain hopeful at least one, thought to be defender Dan Burn, will arrive before the window closes

Interesting few hours ahead.

Read more: http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/spo ... z3yuMC1CEy

User avatar
bigrichiet
Posts: 323
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:07 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by bigrichiet » Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:36 am

lo36789 wrote:
bigrichiet wrote:no one even knows if we get any sell on
Everyone does know there is an 18% clause in there of which we get 50% of it. Just not sure if it is on profit or on overall transfer fee.

We also know as it was clearly stated that it is commercially sensitive information. Why would anyone e-mail Dave Mills when it was made abundantly clear when we first got Burn money that Fulham wouldn't allow any further details to be made public.
ha I didn't know it!, cheers for clarifying

User avatar
Darlobaz79
Posts: 1168
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:17 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Darlobaz79 » Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:32 am

From the Sheff Utd Site...
Dan Burn

After final agreeing a fee for the centre back with Fulham, Dan Burn is subject to a medical at Sheffield United training

Darlo_Pete
Posts: 14082
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by Darlo_Pete » Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:28 pm

Fingers crossed that the deal goes through.

User avatar
divas
Posts: 13213
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by divas » Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:32 pm

If I had to bet on what's going to happen it'll be Burn signing a new deal and going to Sheffield United on loan

tezza
Posts: 1005
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:25 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington
Contact:

Re: Dan Burn

Post by tezza » Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:41 pm

That looks the most likely outcome.

lo36789
Posts: 10931
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Dan Burn

Post by lo36789 » Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:49 pm

Clock is ticking for a full transfer - is the deadline 5PM?

Post Reply