Welcome Kevin Burgess
- Darlo.For.Life
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:57 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Ramshaw has just signed a new one year contract at Gateshead.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Sam Russell has signed for Gateshead
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
And Turnbull looks as if he's staying put. The Chronicle's team of students get it wrong again.
Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Really? Unless someone came in for Jameson or we tear up the deal Provett has just signed, I don't see it happening.Darlofan97 wrote:Adam Bartlett now released by Gateshead. From the North-East and settled with a job with NUFC's Academy. No doubt Blyth will be interested after losing Jeffries.
I think he's worth a look.
Three goalkeepers would be a waste of money, particularly when the two we have are more than capable.
In fact, there's no one from Gateshead's released list I'd be particularly keen on.
Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 5722
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Yes - Gray is always looking to improve, and I think I'd be wrong in saying that signing Provett as back-up was the plan all along.Darlogramps wrote:Really? Unless someone came in for Jameson or we tear up the deal Provett has just signed, I don't see it happening.Darlofan97 wrote:Adam Bartlett now released by Gateshead. From the North-East and settled with a job with NUFC's Academy. No doubt Blyth will be interested after losing Jeffries.
I think he's worth a look.
Three goalkeepers would be a waste of money, particularly when the two we have are more than capable.
In fact, there's no one from Gateshead's released list I'd be particularly keen on.
Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
Has Provett signed a contract, or is he simply on non-contract terms? If it's the latter then I see no problem in him retaining his coaching role - should a better goalkeeper than Jameson become available.
For the record, I think Jameson is a great goalkeeper who has, and will continue, to go strength-to-strength. But, if a goalkeeper with strong FL and Conference experience becomes available in the area, then I think it would interest Gray.
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
I'd be disappointed if Gray signed Bartlett as a new number one and relegated Jameson to the bench.Darlofan97 wrote:
Yes - Gray is always looking to improve, and I think I'd be wrong in saying that signing Provett as back-up was the plan all along.
Has Provett signed a contract, or is he simply on non-contract terms? If it's the latter then I see no problem in him retaining his coaching role - should a better goalkeeper than Jameson become available.
For the record, I think Jameson is a great goalkeeper who has, and will continue, to go strength-to-strength. But, if a goalkeeper with strong FL and Conference experience becomes available in the area, then I think it would interest Gray.
From what I've seen of Bartlett, I honestly would rather Jameson. He's developing, is part of a settled defensive unit and will only get better.
And, as an older player from higher up the pyramid Bartlett would cost more, I'd imagine. There's nothing I've seen from him that would justify shelling out more for a third keeper we don't really need.
Plus Bartlett started his career at Blyth and by all accounts was popular there, so they'd be the more likely destination, given they'll be looking for a new keeper.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
[quote="Darlogramps"][quote="Darlofan97"]
There's nothing I've seen from him that would justify shelling out more for a third keeper we don't really need.
Ok maybe I am being thick but if we do have a Reserve Team (who may play on a Saturday) don't we need a third Keeper so Provett can be on the bench? Or does everyone assume the Under 18's keeper is the Reserve team keeper as well?
There's nothing I've seen from him that would justify shelling out more for a third keeper we don't really need.
Ok maybe I am being thick but if we do have a Reserve Team (who may play on a Saturday) don't we need a third Keeper so Provett can be on the bench? Or does everyone assume the Under 18's keeper is the Reserve team keeper as well?
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Sorry just realised this thread is about KB but seems to have been hi-jacked by discussion bout how many keepers we need. Don't blame me!
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Don't apologise, it's the way conversation works.bga wrote:Sorry just realised this thread is about KB but seems to have been hi-jacked by discussion bout how many keepers we need. Don't blame me!
As for goalkeepers, I was under the impression it would be the U18 keeper. Although given the Development League situation, that may not even prove to be a problem.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
I agree that would seem the sensible way forward. Just hope they sort out a league for our Reserve team before MG holds those trials!Darlogramps wrote:Don't apologise, it's the way conversation works.bga wrote:Sorry just realised this thread is about KB but seems to have been hi-jacked by discussion bout how many keepers we need. Don't blame me!
As for goalkeepers, I was under the impression it would be the U18 keeper. Although given the Development League situation, that may not even prove to be a problem.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
It wouldn't surprise me too much if we didn't name a sub keeper on the bench a lot of the time next season. Provett will travel with the first team anyway to do warm ups with Jameson. But statistically I don't think Jameson actually misses many games through injury etc. Excuse me if I'm wrong but I think the only time he was unavailable for selection last season was the Playoff final where he was suspended. This being the case I can see Provett being used very sparingly even as a sub to allow Gray another outfield option on the bench.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
JE93 You may be right MG didn't always name Bell as a sub last season. I don't know why but I just feel that the higher up the leagues you are the more important it is to have a proper keeper as a sub. Anyway guess MG will make that decision.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
JE93 You may be right MG didn't always name Bell as a sub last season. I don't know why but I just feel that the higher up the leagues you are the more important it is to have a proper keeper as a sub. Anyway guess MG will make that decision.
-
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
If Provett is fit, then he should be on the bench, it would be too risky not to have cover on the bench.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Agreed. The time you don't put a keeper on the bench will sods law be the time you need one.Darlo_Pete wrote:If Provett is fit, then he should be on the bench, it would be too risky not to have cover on the bench.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Or not...Darlogramps wrote:And Turnbull looks as if he's staying put. The Chronicle's team of students get it wrong again.
http://www.gateshead-fc.com/5441/turnbull-moves-on
Sign him up Martin.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
He'll end up signing for Spenny obviously.
Because they are only interested in signing either a) Darlo rejects, or b) Darlo targets by throwing more money at them.
Because they are only interested in signing either a) Darlo rejects, or b) Darlo targets by throwing more money at them.
Re: Welcome Kevin Burgess
Turnbull could sign for Blyth.
However he recently followed Atkinson, and he follows back. So it passes the Atkinson Twitter test.
However he recently followed Atkinson, and he follows back. So it passes the Atkinson Twitter test.
For you to insult me, I must first value your opinion.