Nathan Thomas v Pool

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

Post Reply
User avatar
Quaker0006
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:46 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by Quaker0006 » Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:00 am

See our winger from last season Nathan Thomas scored v Pool for Plymouth. Almost chipped a 2nd which would have been a top goal. Funny in the short time he was with us didn't look up to it.

Michael Smith still doing well for himself also

User avatar
divas
Posts: 13213
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by divas » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:10 am

Jesus, Hartlepool must be REALLY bad.

Bogratsteve
Posts: 4025
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by Bogratsteve » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:35 am

Another one that MG brought in and persisted with but couldn't get to work in the setup, obviously has skills but not the correct one required to play for Darlo

User avatar
Quaker-Ste
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:53 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Monte Darlo

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by Quaker-Ste » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:33 am

I think people need to remember that we are part time and therefore Martin only has limited exposure to work with the squad. Nathan Thomas went to Plymouth on a full time contract where the coaching set up down there can work with him day in day out. It will make a massive difference.

User avatar
divas
Posts: 13213
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by divas » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:50 am

Yep, nail on the head. Full time training, especially for the younger ex-premiership kids who have been used to it makes a massive difference

super_les_mcjannet
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by super_les_mcjannet » Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:20 pm

Don't think we have the patience, time or squad depth to give kids a chance. Let's face it players either hit the ground running or are largely moved on for us.

No reserve/u23 team basically means we can only send players out to other clubs but that is it, most clubs wouldn't want to pay wages for a player they are just trying to get ready for us.

User avatar
Darlo.For.Life
Posts: 1667
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:57 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Newcastle

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by Darlo.For.Life » Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:06 pm

He's just signed for Hartlepool..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/35295105

User avatar
HarrytheQuaker
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:57 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by HarrytheQuaker » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:47 pm

Quaker0006 wrote:See our winger from last season Nathan Thomas scored v Pool for Plymouth. Almost chipped a 2nd which would have been a top goal. Funny in the short time he was with us didn't look up to it.

Michael Smith still doing well for himself also
Where is Michael Smith now???


Sat ont shitter

User avatar
Darlobaz79
Posts: 1168
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:17 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by Darlobaz79 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 8:04 pm

HarrytheQuaker wrote:
Quaker0006 wrote:See our winger from last season Nathan Thomas scored v Pool for Plymouth. Almost chipped a 2nd which would have been a top goal. Funny in the short time he was with us didn't look up to it.

Michael Smith still doing well for himself also
Where is Michael Smith now???


Sat ont shitter
Barnsley

Neil Johnson
Posts: 1260
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by Neil Johnson » Tue Jan 12, 2016 11:09 pm

super_les_mcjannet wrote:Don't think we have the patience, time or squad depth to give kids a chance. Let's face it players either hit the ground running or are largely moved on for us.

No reserve/u23 team basically means we can only send players out to other clubs but that is it, most clubs wouldn't want to pay wages for a player they are just trying to get ready for us.
Different world this part-time stuff!

Kids in academies may be getting 4-5 days of training per week, but older players that aren't quite right for our first team are a problem. When players switch to part-time training they could deteriorate, or not progress sufficiently with reduced coaching.

This could explain for the revolving door signings we have had with youngsters of late. Experienced part-timers have been our best signings.

Supplementary training, at say Gateshead, would probably be too expensive for Darlo and for compensating players for lost income. Regular practise games look to be the only practical way of supplementing training for improving those who dont respond to part-time training alone.

AndyPark
Posts: 12155
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:08 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by AndyPark » Tue Jan 12, 2016 11:44 pm

Why would Gateshead want to play host to training our players anyways? :roll: :roll:

AndyPark
Posts: 12155
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:08 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by AndyPark » Thu Jan 14, 2016 7:58 pm

Darlobaz79 wrote:
HarrytheQuaker wrote:
Quaker0006 wrote:See our winger from last season Nathan Thomas scored v Pool for Plymouth. Almost chipped a 2nd which would have been a top goal. Funny in the short time he was with us didn't look up to it.

Michael Smith still doing well for himself also
Where is Michael Smith now???


Sat ont shitter
Barnsley
Pools are after him now, had a bid turned down.

Could soon be 3 ex Darlo at Pools in the near future if they up the offer.

User avatar
divas
Posts: 13213
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by divas » Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:31 pm

Should be in for some more cash from Smith in January

User avatar
Robbie Painter
Posts: 2289
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:37 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by Robbie Painter » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:09 am

divas wrote:Should be in for some more cash from Smith in January
Why?

User avatar
divas
Posts: 13213
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:38 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Nathan Thomas v Pool

Post by divas » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:44 am

Robbie Painter wrote:
divas wrote:Should be in for some more cash from Smith in January
Why?
Charlton have a sell on fee clause with Swindon which will in turn activate our % of any future sell on clause we had with Charlton - diminishing returns I know but better than nothing.

Post Reply