Warrington Excuses

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

User avatar
theoriginalfatcat
Posts: 6775
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Warrington Excuses

Post by theoriginalfatcat » Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:43 pm

Fatty - they haven't. They almost certainly would have lost the game by more than 2 goals and the fine is minimal.
Profile pic ↗️
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!

Quakerz
Posts: 20958
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:32 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Warrington Excuses

Post by Quakerz » Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:48 pm

theoriginalfatcat wrote:In my opinion the right decision was made in relation to us ,however Warrington Town management must be having a little private chuckle - as they haven't really been punished at all for their skulduggery.
Not so sure that they'll be chuckling.

They will have been chuckling at the fact that they got a match abandoned and *thought* they had dodged certain defeat, and probably *thought* they would get to play again. They will have chuckled at how clever they thought they were to seize the opportunity, however...they wasted their time.

Don't get me wrong, they won't be devastated either, but I'm sure they won't be so smug right now.

All that matters is that we got what we deserved - the points.
Image

“Everybody knows where that club is going now, so I’m out of the way. They can carry on, it’s their club, they can keep it." - Raj Singh, 2017

User avatar
theoriginalfatcat
Posts: 6775
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Warrington Excuses

Post by theoriginalfatcat » Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:59 pm

Any possible replay would of had a poisonous atmosphere. It's good that it's not going to happen.
Profile pic ↗️
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!

Fatty eats roadkill
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:31 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: On top of a 29 year old big chested woman

Re: Warrington Excuses

Post by Fatty eats roadkill » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:00 pm

My opinion wrote:Not like you to miss the point is it fatty
And the point is mr im so intellectual?
Waiting for Raj to shaft them!

TFDM
Posts: 2123
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:32 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Contact:

Re: Warrington Excuses

Post by TFDM » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:35 pm

dickdarlington wrote:FAO Kev

Can we see the goals now please?
You may. I'm on my way home so I'll do it when I get in.

User avatar
Spyman
Posts: 12675
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Warrington Excuses

Post by Spyman » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:59 pm

A possibly slightly dangerous precedent has been set by not deducting points from Warrington or dishing out a harsher fine.

If a team has a couple of players sent off and is facing a potential hammering, what is to stop them coming up with a reason to abandon the match and therefore being awarded a 1 or 2 goal defeat, rather than a 5 or 6 goal defeat?
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.

We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.

Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.

DC

Fatty eats roadkill
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:31 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: On top of a 29 year old big chested woman

Re: Warrington Excuses

Post by Fatty eats roadkill » Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:21 pm

Doesn't that make it an automatic 3-0 in that scenario?
Waiting for Raj to shaft them!

Post Reply