Bishop Auckland tonight
- CrazyDarlo
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:22 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Thirsk
Bishop Auckland tonight
Is there any commentary tonight
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Pretty full strength team tonight with players in their more familiar positions:
Bell; Trialist, Brown, Hunter, Galbraith; Portas, J.Armstrong, Mitchell; Thompson, Hatch, Fisher
Subs: Jameson, White, Robinson, Scott, Purewal, Dowson
Bishop 1-0 up thru Danny Brunskill
Galbraith equalises for Darlo 1-1
From twitter (DarloTrust)
Bell; Trialist, Brown, Hunter, Galbraith; Portas, J.Armstrong, Mitchell; Thompson, Hatch, Fisher
Subs: Jameson, White, Robinson, Scott, Purewal, Dowson
Bishop 1-0 up thru Danny Brunskill
Galbraith equalises for Darlo 1-1
From twitter (DarloTrust)
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
2-1 Amar
- CrazyDarlo
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:22 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Thirsk
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
2-1 amar
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
2-1 FT
- CrazyDarlo
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:22 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Thirsk
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
any idea on attendance
-
- Posts: 12155
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:08 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Just a few hundred I would imagine.
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:59 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Quite impressed with the guy who played right back. Anyone knows who he is. Getting a bit sick of the long ball game we have got into the habit of playing. When we actually played through the midfield we scored. Impressed with Portas think he is an excellent signing. Tomo not at the races again think he has had a poor pre season in the games i have seen. Hope he can pick himself up for the spendymoor game.
-
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Just got back, 1st half we were not at our best, transformation in the 2nd with introduction of Dowson Purewal and Scott, young lad at RB had a good game David Mitchell, (assume its Adams brother) put the best cross in the in late on in the 2nd half.
Not convinced about James Armstrong seen him a couple of times now. Jordan Robinson still looks well off the pace at the moment.
Not convinced about James Armstrong seen him a couple of times now. Jordan Robinson still looks well off the pace at the moment.
Help get the club back to Darlo by helping to spread the word about the "Back to Darlo!" fund. The image on the right will be constantly updated with the latest total so please feel free to use the image link below the thermometer on your own signatures, blogs, websites, etc. | Image link: http://www.mydarlo.co.uk/img/BTD-therm-350x100.jpg |
-
- Posts: 5995
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
What I took from tonight.
Hatch and Fisher didn't work, the two players didn't like up at all. I wan Fisher to do well but it just isn't happening for him.
Brown and Hunter were a bit nervous at the back together, White and Brown were better in the second half. No big thing on any of them but opening day I would go White and Hunter or White and Brown at CB.
The right back was excellent, if we are not trying to sign him right now then we will miss out.
Armstrong was ok but didn't stand out, maybe needs time but if playing a 3 in midfield with Portas and Mitchell we need Scott or Robinson in there.
Amar and Dowson were good when they came on without being outstanding but certainly a step up from Hatch and Fisher, they worked harder and looked more of a danger.
If 4-3-3 then opening day I would go with.
Bell
Trialist, White, Hunter, Galbraith
Mitchell, Scott, Portas
Dowson, G Armstrong, Purewal
Subs
Hatch, Fisher, Jameson, Walker, Brown.
4-4-2
Bell
Trialist, White, Hunter, Scott
Mitchell, Portas, Galbraith, Purewal
Dowson, G Armstrong
Subs
Hatch, Fisher, Jameson, Walker, Brown.
Hatch and Fisher didn't work, the two players didn't like up at all. I wan Fisher to do well but it just isn't happening for him.
Brown and Hunter were a bit nervous at the back together, White and Brown were better in the second half. No big thing on any of them but opening day I would go White and Hunter or White and Brown at CB.
The right back was excellent, if we are not trying to sign him right now then we will miss out.
Armstrong was ok but didn't stand out, maybe needs time but if playing a 3 in midfield with Portas and Mitchell we need Scott or Robinson in there.
Amar and Dowson were good when they came on without being outstanding but certainly a step up from Hatch and Fisher, they worked harder and looked more of a danger.
If 4-3-3 then opening day I would go with.
Bell
Trialist, White, Hunter, Galbraith
Mitchell, Scott, Portas
Dowson, G Armstrong, Purewal
Subs
Hatch, Fisher, Jameson, Walker, Brown.
4-4-2
Bell
Trialist, White, Hunter, Scott
Mitchell, Portas, Galbraith, Purewal
Dowson, G Armstrong
Subs
Hatch, Fisher, Jameson, Walker, Brown.
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Bishop Auckland tonight
Enjoyed the game, points of note for me.
The Mitchell brothers were excellent and on that showing we have a new RB.
Good to see Skip back in CB, good game.
Portas for me is the missing link we never had last season, never stopped running, tackled well and played sone good balls, a must player for me.
Thought the Hatch/Fish partnership worked sort off but were unlucky, however Dowson/Purewal was very good so what do you do!!
Thommo apart from a couple of moments was a non entity and is already on holiday.
Jury is out on who to start in goal, both great keepers but Jamesons kicking game is much better.
Overall I'm still not sure on the team but happier now I've seen the match about our expectations.
Armstrong is not up to it I'm afraid, don't expect to see him again
Last point, great to see Scott back and he's not match yet but made a difference when he was on.
The Mitchell brothers were excellent and on that showing we have a new RB.
Good to see Skip back in CB, good game.
Portas for me is the missing link we never had last season, never stopped running, tackled well and played sone good balls, a must player for me.
Thought the Hatch/Fish partnership worked sort off but were unlucky, however Dowson/Purewal was very good so what do you do!!
Thommo apart from a couple of moments was a non entity and is already on holiday.
Jury is out on who to start in goal, both great keepers but Jamesons kicking game is much better.
Overall I'm still not sure on the team but happier now I've seen the match about our expectations.
Armstrong is not up to it I'm afraid, don't expect to see him again
Last point, great to see Scott back and he's not match yet but made a difference when he was on.
Last edited by Bogratsteve on Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:55 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
poppyfield wrote:Just got back, 1st half we were not at our best, transformation in the 2nd with introduction of Dowson Purewal and Scott, young lad at RB had a good game David Mitchell, (assume its Adams brother) put the best cross in the in late on in the 2nd half.
Not convinced about James Armstrong seen him a couple of times now. Jordan Robinson still looks well off the pace at the moment.
The RB, I am lead to believe, was Liam Marrs.
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Oh I'm sure they said it was Mitchell, anyhow he was excellentFibonacci0112358 wrote:poppyfield wrote:Just got back, 1st half we were not at our best, transformation in the 2nd with introduction of Dowson Purewal and Scott, young lad at RB had a good game David Mitchell, (assume its Adams brother) put the best cross in the in late on in the 2nd half.
Not convinced about James Armstrong seen him a couple of times now. Jordan Robinson still looks well off the pace at the moment.
The RB, I am lead to believe, was Liam Marrs.
-
- Posts: 5995
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Looking at his profile pic on Sunderland website then you are right.
Excellent player and Gray should be looking to offer him something straight away from what I seen.
Excellent player and Gray should be looking to offer him something straight away from what I seen.
-
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:55 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Bogratsteve wrote:Oh I'm sure they said it was Mitchell, anyhow he was excellentFibonacci0112358 wrote:poppyfield wrote:Just got back, 1st half we were not at our best, transformation in the 2nd with introduction of Dowson Purewal and Scott, young lad at RB had a good game David Mitchell, (assume its Adams brother) put the best cross in the in late on in the 2nd half.
Not convinced about James Armstrong seen him a couple of times now. Jordan Robinson still looks well off the pace at the moment.
The RB, I am lead to believe, was Liam Marrs.
They did indeed say he was Mitchell, but they were incorrect.
And he was very good, so would be a decent signing whatever he decides to call himself.
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
I'd imagine they were intentionally incorrect. Most probably reporting the name they had been given by Gray in order to keep the player's identity under wraps....the use that it was.
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Quick write up from tonight
http://simonhahn89.wordpress.com/2014/0 ... arlington/
Good to get a win on the board, felt we were a lot better in the second half
http://simonhahn89.wordpress.com/2014/0 ... arlington/
Good to get a win on the board, felt we were a lot better in the second half
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:34 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
First-half I actually thought we played quite good. We pressed well, retained possession with some nice passes and were unlucky not to have scored at least one more. Bishop's goal came from a set-piece which is something we need to work on.
Bell didn't have that much to do, pulled off one good save before half-time but nothing else of note. With the trialist it seems we have a really good player so hopefully Gray can sort something out. Brown and Hunter were okay, a little shaky but nothing to worry about. Truth be told the second-half performance from Brown was like a throwback to the NL season, very, very solid and composed. Much better seeing him at centre-back.
Portas and Mitchell were both excellent throughout the game. Portas seems to be the complete midfielder we were desperately missing last season and Mitchell was technically a cut above. Not convinced on James Armstrong based on his first-half performance and I thought Scott offered a bit more when he came on in the second-half. I'd still like to see another midfielder brought in, someone who kicks everything that moves, a bit like Ellison who we had in the NL.
Thompson was well off the pace but it was good to see that we still created a fair few chances. Fisher hit the post with the best chance of the first-half and Mitchell also came close. Hatch won a lot in the air as you'd expect but struggled to link up with Fisher who, as mentioned, perhaps should have scored. Dowson looked sharp, very unlucky not to score and was a constant menace all of the second-half. Purewal as well linked up well with the midfield and he took his goal well.
Not sure where the long-ball comment has come from. We passed it sharply for the majority and looked to get players on the ball. Any 'long-balls' were just working the channels or centre-backs looking to force the issue. Much, much better tonight and Gray got the selection spot on.
Bell didn't have that much to do, pulled off one good save before half-time but nothing else of note. With the trialist it seems we have a really good player so hopefully Gray can sort something out. Brown and Hunter were okay, a little shaky but nothing to worry about. Truth be told the second-half performance from Brown was like a throwback to the NL season, very, very solid and composed. Much better seeing him at centre-back.
Portas and Mitchell were both excellent throughout the game. Portas seems to be the complete midfielder we were desperately missing last season and Mitchell was technically a cut above. Not convinced on James Armstrong based on his first-half performance and I thought Scott offered a bit more when he came on in the second-half. I'd still like to see another midfielder brought in, someone who kicks everything that moves, a bit like Ellison who we had in the NL.
Thompson was well off the pace but it was good to see that we still created a fair few chances. Fisher hit the post with the best chance of the first-half and Mitchell also came close. Hatch won a lot in the air as you'd expect but struggled to link up with Fisher who, as mentioned, perhaps should have scored. Dowson looked sharp, very unlucky not to score and was a constant menace all of the second-half. Purewal as well linked up well with the midfield and he took his goal well.
Not sure where the long-ball comment has come from. We passed it sharply for the majority and looked to get players on the ball. Any 'long-balls' were just working the channels or centre-backs looking to force the issue. Much, much better tonight and Gray got the selection spot on.
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
-
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
MG mentioned that he might arrange another preseason game if he thought it necessary, i think we do, MG should now be clear on what his starting line up for Warrington will be, the only partnership that has not been tried up front is Armstrong&Dowson. Scott needs more game time (last night he did well but a bit rusty as you would expect)
IMO players like to play so i dont think 2 weeks off before the seson starts is a good thing, keep them sharp.
On last nights showing my starting line up would be,
Bell
Marrs Brown Hunter Galbraith
Mitchell Potas Scott
Dowson Armstrong Purewal
subs Fisher Hatch White Jameson
IMO players like to play so i dont think 2 weeks off before the seson starts is a good thing, keep them sharp.
On last nights showing my starting line up would be,
Bell
Marrs Brown Hunter Galbraith
Mitchell Potas Scott
Dowson Armstrong Purewal
subs Fisher Hatch White Jameson
Help get the club back to Darlo by helping to spread the word about the "Back to Darlo!" fund. The image on the right will be constantly updated with the latest total so please feel free to use the image link below the thermometer on your own signatures, blogs, websites, etc. | Image link: http://www.mydarlo.co.uk/img/BTD-therm-350x100.jpg |
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
So would you start an untried partnership upfront?
Essentially the team you have will most likely start but I would also like to see another friendly with Dowson playing the full 90 mins and trying both hatch & Armstrong with him over the 2 halves.
You may see Walker at LB and Galbraith in CM with Scott taking a few more weeks to get up to match fitness
Essentially the team you have will most likely start but I would also like to see another friendly with Dowson playing the full 90 mins and trying both hatch & Armstrong with him over the 2 halves.
You may see Walker at LB and Galbraith in CM with Scott taking a few more weeks to get up to match fitness
-
- Posts: 5995
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
G Armstrong and Dowson played 45 mins against Benfield first pre-season game and you could see the two would link up well. Just needs developing.
Possibly a bit late to develop a partnership for first game of the season though but who knows. I also thought Hatch was quite good last night but just him and Fisher couldn't link up enough.
1st game, 3 forwards - Purewal, Dowson, Hatch/Armstrong
1st game, 2 forwards - Dowson Hatch/Armstrong (Amar on the wing)
Didn't even click last night but anyone know where Hopson was.
Possibly a bit late to develop a partnership for first game of the season though but who knows. I also thought Hatch was quite good last night but just him and Fisher couldn't link up enough.
1st game, 3 forwards - Purewal, Dowson, Hatch/Armstrong
1st game, 2 forwards - Dowson Hatch/Armstrong (Amar on the wing)
Didn't even click last night but anyone know where Hopson was.
-
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Missed that game and obviously that partnership, i still stick with what i saidsuper_les_mcjannet wrote:G Armstrong and Dowson played 45 mins against Benfield first pre-season game and you could see the two would link up well. Just needs developing.
Possibly a bit late to develop a partnership for first game of the season though but who knows. I also thought Hatch was quite good last night but just him and Fisher couldn't link up enough.
1st game, 3 forwards - Purewal, Dowson, Hatch/Armstrong
1st game, 2 forwards - Dowson Hatch/Armstrong (Amar on the wing)
Didn't even click last night but anyone know where Hopson was.
Help get the club back to Darlo by helping to spread the word about the "Back to Darlo!" fund. The image on the right will be constantly updated with the latest total so please feel free to use the image link below the thermometer on your own signatures, blogs, websites, etc. | Image link: http://www.mydarlo.co.uk/img/BTD-therm-350x100.jpg |
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Holidays I understand
-
- Posts: 5995
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Haha, it was only 45 mins so not too much to go off but the two of them linked up well on a few occasions. Something there but the two have missed each other with holidays, which is a shame.poppyfield wrote: Missed that game and obviously that partnership, i still stick with what i said
I agree with the fact we probably need a game on Saturday but most leagues have started. Weldon was also again sat on the bench with the lads, it does seem something there for him once fit.
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Agreed, he has 3 months before he starts playing/training thosuper_les_mcjannet wrote:Haha, it was only 45 mins so not too much to go off but the two of them linked up well on a few occasions. Something there but the two have missed each other with holidays, which is a shame.poppyfield wrote: Missed that game and obviously that partnership, i still stick with what i said
I agree with the fact we probably need a game on Saturday but most leagues have started. Weldon was also again sat on the bench with the lads, it does seem something there for him once fit.
-
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:25 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Darlington
- Contact:
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Half decent game against opposition that wanted it but were outplayed.
Portas and Mitchell are definite starts, real quality about both. Hatch could be pleased with his up front contribution. Suspect there will be few defenders relishing him opposing them.
Biggest negative, as others have said, Thommo seems a shadow of the player a year ago, seems also to have a temperament issue. Just wonder if he feels disappointed that things have not worked out the way he wanted.
To me the jury is no longer out on Fisher, perseverance is one thing obstinacy another. He is not good enough.
Portas and Mitchell are definite starts, real quality about both. Hatch could be pleased with his up front contribution. Suspect there will be few defenders relishing him opposing them.
Biggest negative, as others have said, Thommo seems a shadow of the player a year ago, seems also to have a temperament issue. Just wonder if he feels disappointed that things have not worked out the way he wanted.
To me the jury is no longer out on Fisher, perseverance is one thing obstinacy another. He is not good enough.
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
Thommo is off on holiday. I don't think you can judge him as not being the player he was a year ago based on pre season. In fact his best performances last season were only about 4months ago!
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
I'd start the first game with Purewal and Dowson up top. Although I've not seen any of pre-season, as we've chopped and changed so much I think it is logical to start the season with a pairing that know each other inside out and we know can perform together as a pair. Especially as we're missing Thompson.
The last thing we want is to try a 'new' pairing and find they don't click straight away, especially with our main creative force unavailable. Dowson and Purewal may not end up our best pairing throughout the season, but I'd start with with them to get things off to a solid start.
The last thing we want is to try a 'new' pairing and find they don't click straight away, especially with our main creative force unavailable. Dowson and Purewal may not end up our best pairing throughout the season, but I'd start with with them to get things off to a solid start.
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:57 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Bishop Auckland tonight
I'm not the biggest fan of Purewal of late, to many chances missed but last night he was much more confident and winning the headers and his distribution was much better than of late, before last night I would not have started with him but now i'm relaxed about it.