Stockdale rumour

Post by **D_F_C** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:38 am

Read today in that very credible paper...the sun that Brighton have made a bid of 1mill for stockdale.

Could be rubbish, but though I would mention it. I would expect stockdale to be number 1 and steklenberg to leave

quakerray · Post by **quakerray** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:56 pm

they are talking about it on fulham and brighton forums, saying 1m is a bargain, £90k to us would be great though
only got 1 year on his contract to, what happens if he went for nothing next year, do we get nowt.

divas · Post by **divas** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 1:14 pm

Aye get him sold and name a stand after him

Fatty eats roadkill · Post by **Fatty eats roadkill** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:03 pm

For once Divas and I agree!

dickdarlington · Post by **dickdarlington** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 6:34 pm

Thinking about this. Will he be first choice at Fulham his year? If so will we get more from appearance fees? Or from the sell on clause? Do we know for certain we're still entitled to a sell on clause. Didn't Houghton cash in on some bits?

divas · Post by **divas** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 6:36 pm

Think we're about done on appearance fees

Darlofan97 · Post by **Darlofan97** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:00 pm

Only appearance fees due now are those from Dan Burn, IIRC.

The only way we're going to make money on Stockdale now is through Fulham moving him on, surely he's worth more than that though?!

quakerray · Post by **quakerray** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:20 pm

this was last updated in january http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/david-st ... eler/67339

dickdarlington · Post by **dickdarlington** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:42 pm

In that case. Sell. Sell. Sell.

micra3 · Post by **micra3** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:18 pm

This time last year Fulham turned down a £4m bid from Hull.

HarrytheQuaker · Post by **HarrytheQuaker** » Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:20 pm

micra3 wrote:This time last year Fulham turned down a £4m bid from Hull.

Sell sell sell sell, or too late then

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Twintowers · Post by **Twintowers** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 8:18 am

micra3 wrote:This time last year Fulham turned down a £4m bid from Hull.

Seem to recall this the other way round.Hull made an enquiry and were quoted 4 mill and said no thanks.

Post by **D_F_C** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:22 pm

Twintowers wrote:
micra3 wrote:This time last year Fulham turned down a £4m bid from Hull.
Seem to recall this the other way round.Hull made an enquiry and were quoted 4 mill and said no thanks.

Different manager, different division, different situation.

also just spent something stupid on McCormack (about 11m I heard) and Remy is going to go for 8.75m

Darlo.For.Life · Post by **Darlo.For.Life** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:03 pm

He has signed for Brighton for an undisclosed fee.

http://www.fulhamfc.com/news/2014/july/ ... ampaign=TB

Darlo Till I Die · Post by **Darlo Till I Die** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:04 pm

So we'll get 9% of the undisclosed fee?

I wonder how much he went for. Let's hope it wasn't for £0.00

darlo_baron · Post by **darlo_baron** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:21 pm

Figure rumoured to be around the 1 million mark.

Neil_Heaneys_Pace · Post by **Neil_Heaneys_Pace** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:21 pm

600k
Sent from my RM-875_eu_euro1_211 using Tapatalk

lo36789 · Post by **lo36789** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:23 pm

Very nice. One things for sure we won't find out how much!

Darlo Till I Die · Post by **Darlo Till I Die** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:23 pm

Neil_Heaneys_Pace wrote:600k
Sent from my RM-875_eu_euro1_211 using Tapatalk

I've also heard 1 million. Even so 90k is still a decent amount!.

Even if it was 600k I'd be happy with the 9% which is 54k.

Good amounts of money for our move back to town etc.

poppyfield · Post by **poppyfield** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:34 pm

A bit more info
http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2014 ... n-fc/32370

lo36789 · Post by **lo36789** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:46 pm

We havn't had a bad time since Dan Burn played against Norwich!

£75k - Dan Burn first appearance
£x k - David Stockdale's 50th Fulham appearance (His 40th has happened since which was also rumoured to be the trigger - said to be £12.5k)
£x k - Michael Smith sell on clause
£60k - Share issue
£15k - Sunderland game (conservative estimate)
£54k to £90k - David Stockdale sell on clause

Rumoured...
£x k - Dan Burn's 10th appearance

Potentially £250k+ from none matchdays revenues!

Jeff Jones · Post by **Jeff Jones** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:00 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/28531330

Post by **D_F_C** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:40 pm

Get in!

Mr_Tibbs · Post by **Mr_Tibbs** » Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:25 pm

Great news, and the best of luck to him at Brighton.

dickdarlington · Post by **dickdarlington** » Tue Jul 29, 2014 2:19 pm

Straight away looking at the potential of £54K as a rumoured minimum. And us having £60K of debt remaining. Surely it makes sense to clear the debt once and for all, and to then invest all future revenues into getting home, and strengthening the team (if needed). It will be a lot easier to attract investment going forwards if there is a clear directive as to what the money will be spent on.

TSQuaker · Post by **TSQuaker** » Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:02 pm

Great news for the club - massive boost financially.

Maurice_Peddelty · Post by **Maurice_Peddelty** » Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:58 pm

dickdarlington wrote:Straight away looking at the potential of £54K as a rumoured minimum. And us having £60K of debt remaining. Surely it makes sense to clear the debt once and for all, and to then invest all future revenues into getting home, and strengthening the team (if needed). It will be a lot easier to attract investment going forwards if there is a clear directive as to what the money will be spent on.

I have absolutely no idea what the terms of any sell on clause might be, but before anyone gets carried away, isn't it usual that these clauses are tied to the profit generated by the sale [therefore account would need to be given to the amount included in the initial transfer] also, wouldn't the adminstrator be entitled to half of the proceeds?

Neil_Heaneys_Pace · Post by **Neil_Heaneys_Pace** » Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:10 pm

Maurice_Peddelty wrote:
dickdarlington wrote:Straight away looking at the potential of £54K as a rumoured minimum. And us having £60K of debt remaining. Surely it makes sense to clear the debt once and for all, and to then invest all future revenues into getting home, and strengthening the team (if needed). It will be a lot easier to attract investment going forwards if there is a clear directive as to what the money will be spent on.
I have absolutely no idea what the terms of any sell on clause might be, but before anyone gets carried away, isn't it usual that these clauses are tied to the profit generated by the sale [therefore account would need to be given to the amount included in the initial transfer] also, wouldn't the adminstrator be entitled to half of the proceeds?

I totally agree, but isnt this what forums are all about getting giddy before reality coms and piss's all over our chips.

Post by **D_F_C** » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:16 pm

the rumour is that it's 9% to admin, 9% to us.

Also, if the debt it £60k but we aren't paying interest then I wouldn't necessarily wipe it out straight away. If there is interest on the debt, then I would want to wipe a bit out.

joejaques · Post by **joejaques** » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:41 pm

Neil_Heaneys_Pace wrote:
Maurice_Peddelty wrote:
dickdarlington wrote:Straight away looking at the potential of £54K as a rumoured minimum. And us having £60K of debt remaining. Surely it makes sense to clear the debt once and for all, and to then invest all future revenues into getting home, and strengthening the team (if needed). It will be a lot easier to attract investment going forwards if there is a clear directive as to what the money will be spent on.
I have absolutely no idea what the terms of any sell on clause might be, but before anyone gets carried away, isn't it usual that these clauses are tied to the profit generated by the sale [therefore account would need to be given to the amount included in the initial transfer] also, wouldn't the adminstrator be entitled to half of the proceeds?
I totally agree, but isnt this what forums are all about getting giddy before reality coms and piss's all over our chips.

Darlo Uncovered

Stockdale rumour

Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour

Re: Stockdale rumour