A kick in the Jacobs wrote:This thread topic has caused me to have the worst opinion possible of Darlo fans.
No scruples, no brains to question things, no intelligence period, really. The fact that Charlie is a moderator (and seemingly respected) despite being one of the most intelligently-challenged people I've ever come across says everything.
The heart-warming contributions from the Darlo fans who possess objectivity is small consolation but they are clearly the minority.
I now hope the club fails. The club is the fans and the fans are mostly cvnts.
To those fair-minded folk: get yourself another interest. This shower isn't worth it.
Bye-bye, you dregs of life.
Since you're going to stereotype, I suppose I should lower my opinion of "Narwich" fans accordingly too.
"Intelligently challenged"? I haven't seen you challenge a single person in this thread nor the others in an intelligent fashion.
You have been given the correct advice on more than one occasion by several different members of this forum. You are the one with the understanding of the issue. You are the one making the accusation. You are the one who should take this to the proper body to get the answers. Yet you aren't even a Darlo fan. So why are you even here?
I had accepted you may have an issue - most other people had accepted you may have an issue - and you have been told how to get that issue resolved. Yet you chose to go round and round in circles. "Not a Darlo fan. Not my problem." And then somewhere along the line you compared it to child abuse. Really?
When it became clear that no-one was going to pick up your little problem and do the hard work for you, or that the CIC weren't going to sprint onto this unofficial message board, the flouncing and insults began. You've accused members of this forum of being "soft" on child abuse because they dared to challenge your analogy. You've insulted me and at least one moderator - ironically the moderator with - I hope she doesn't mind me saying - a record of challenging the board on things and getting answers. You chose to attack the person best placed to have done your job for you if only you could've been nice about it.
And then, finally, having gotten dizzy from going round in circles so often, you flounce off in a huff like all good trolls eventually do, in a hail of insults and "wah wah wah, no-one wants to do my job for me so I hope you all fail."
I can't say I'll miss you. We've locked horns on more than one occasion and you're probably lucky you hadn't been permanently banned before now so you were able to level these accusations in the first place. Now you've decided to leave voluntarily so I suppose I should be grateful you've saved me a few mouse clicks.
(To the rest of you, I'm sorry this thread got derailed when it should've been a discussion about the content of the Q+A. In part, it has been. When I've got time tomorrow I'll split the thread into those kinds of parts, and everything else.)