Advertise Here
You are here: darlofc.co.uk » Board index » The Uncovered Forums » Virtual Feethams
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 2:50 am View unanswered posts | View active topics



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 7:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:58 am
Posts: 42
Team Supported: Darlington
Could either Charlie or Botrash tell me why they have deleted my posts from the discussion we were having last night please? Considering we were discussing unnecessary censorship I'd be a bit worried if it was because you didn't agree with my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:07 pm
Posts: 6148
Team Supported: Darlington
I suggest you look further down the board before kicking off - the guys will look forward to your apology.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20319


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:58 am
Posts: 42
Team Supported: Darlington
Hilly wrote:
I suggest you look further down the board before kicking off - the guys will look forward to your apology.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20319


Fair enough, I apologise to Botrash and Charlie but I didn't notice the new thread. Feel free to remove this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 1916
Team Supported: Darlington
monkey wrote:
Hilly wrote:
I suggest you look further down the board before kicking off - the guys will look forward to your apology.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20319


Fair enough, I apologise to Botrash and Charlie but I didn't notice the new thread. Feel free to remove this thread.


Why remove it?? Surely we all should be allowed to see the type of guy that the moderators are dealing with here ... although the other thread says it all really ... :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:58 am
Posts: 42
Team Supported: Darlington
AIDO wrote:
monkey wrote:
Hilly wrote:
I suggest you look further down the board before kicking off - the guys will look forward to your apology.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20319


Fair enough, I apologise to Botrash and Charlie but I didn't notice the new thread. Feel free to remove this thread.


Why remove it?? Surely we all should be allowed to see the type of guy that the moderators are dealing with here ... although the other thread says it all really ... :roll:


I'm happy for it to be left if you want. I've apologised and that's that. What do you mean the type of guy the mods are dealing with?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:32 pm
Posts: 18681
Team Supported: Darlington
From time to time you get people that appear on here and always seem to have a cob on about opinions.

"It's only an opinion" they say. "I'm entitled to my opinion" they complain. "You did x, y and z to this person because you didn't agree with their opinion" they shout.

Opinions are NOT immune to consequences, and moderators get to decide what is and isn't acceptable.

Gadaffi and Hussein both had different opinions on stuff to normal people.

_________________
http://twitter.com/Quakerz72

fat tony wrote:
As for the opinion expressed about Darlo fans… meh. It’s just the same old thought-averse guff that every other pointing, gawping, Northern League villager with an axe-to-grind / pitchfork-to-shake has cobbled together about us.


fat tony wrote:
When you look into the NCE it does look like a significantly better run organisation than the Royston Vasey Invitational Clown Challenge that we've ended up in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2270
Team Supported: Darlington
monkey wrote:
AIDO wrote:
monkey wrote:
Hilly wrote:
I suggest you look further down the board before kicking off - the guys will look forward to your apology.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20319


Fair enough, I apologise to Botrash and Charlie but I didn't notice the new thread. Feel free to remove this thread.


Why remove it?? Surely we all should be allowed to see the type of guy that the moderators are dealing with here ... although the other thread says it all really ... :roll:


I'm happy for it to be left if you want. I've apologised and that's that. What do you mean the type of guy the mods are dealing with?


I reckon he thinks you're a cock!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:58 am
Posts: 42
Team Supported: Darlington
comeondarlo wrote:
monkey wrote:
AIDO wrote:
monkey wrote:
Hilly wrote:
I suggest you look further down the board before kicking off - the guys will look forward to your apology.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20319


Fair enough, I apologise to Botrash and Charlie but I didn't notice the new thread. Feel free to remove this thread.


Why remove it?? Surely we all should be allowed to see the type of guy that the moderators are dealing with here ... although the other thread says it all really ... :roll:


I'm happy for it to be left if you want. I've apologised and that's that. What do you mean the type of guy the mods are dealing with?


I reckon he thinks you're a cock!


I think you're right. I'd love to know why though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:58 am
Posts: 42
Team Supported: Darlington
Quakerz wrote:
From time to time you get people that appear on here and always seem to have a cob on about opinions.

"It's only an opinion" they say. "I'm entitled to my opinion" they complain. "You did x, y and z to this person because you didn't agree with their opinion" they shout.

Opinions are NOT immune to consequences, and moderators get to decide what is and isn't acceptable.

Gadaffi and Hussein both had different opinions on stuff to normal people.


Yeah and they weren't too keen on allowing other people to express their opinions as well!
Do you remember when some bloke asked for you to be banned? He was rightly ignored but what if a mod agreed with him?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:32 pm
Posts: 18681
Team Supported: Darlington
Yes it was DC.

The mods don't ban people because somebody calls for a banning, they look at the evidence of the posts made by the accused.

Enigma clearly, clearly, was only here to cause trouble, and they made the right call.

_________________
http://twitter.com/Quakerz72

fat tony wrote:
As for the opinion expressed about Darlo fans… meh. It’s just the same old thought-averse guff that every other pointing, gawping, Northern League villager with an axe-to-grind / pitchfork-to-shake has cobbled together about us.


fat tony wrote:
When you look into the NCE it does look like a significantly better run organisation than the Royston Vasey Invitational Clown Challenge that we've ended up in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Censorship
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:24 pm
Posts: 1657
Team Supported: Darlington
monkey wrote:
Quakerz wrote:
From time to time you get people that appear on here and always seem to have a cob on about opinions.

"It's only an opinion" they say. "I'm entitled to my opinion" they complain. "You did x, y and z to this person because you didn't agree with their opinion" they shout.

Opinions are NOT immune to consequences, and moderators get to decide what is and isn't acceptable.

Gadaffi and Hussein both had different opinions on stuff to normal people.


Yeah and they weren't too keen on allowing other people to express their opinions as well!
Do you remember when some bloke asked for you to be banned? He was rightly ignored but what if a mod agreed with him?



I dont think you get it do you, if i banned everyone whose opinion I didnt agree with then there would only be a select few people left, I`ve also had to tone myself down as well because you cant do the `do as I say not as I do` routine.
This board is an unofficial forum, however its been a fantastic tool used to help the fight of saving Darlo FC.
Each person who has recieved a banning has been looked at individually and also go through a process before being banned completley. The why`s and wherefores I`m not prepared to discuss with you, we do that as a moderation team.
Having the board in an uproar is not an option, media outlets watch this board, I`ve personally seen threads on this board quoted in Newspapers the next day. Information from this board making it to the tv and the radio, not too bad for an unofficial message board but thats the way it is.
When folk disagree we do listen and sometimes act accordingly. However on the subject of the person you are dsicussing being banned I personally feel it was the right thing to do. Now if you reply I`ll get to it at some point but I have a busy day ahead of me which will finish sitting in a pub with the twitter ladies

_________________
@Charliejovi on twitter


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group