princes town wrote:
The article mentions some positive developments at the ground. If I had one tentative suggestion (given the financial context) it is whether there was any potential for a small amount of stepped terracing to avoid potential issues with the grass verges. Would there be any prospect for the Football Grounds Trust to provide some grants?
I doubt we will be looking for grants to improve Bishop's ground, it is already fine for their needs. Erecting a small stepped terrace down on side or end of the pitch might be viable when we get a venue and Darlington, but really doing it at Bishop is a waste of time because you couldn't take it with you.
I think 1883 have the right idea at the moment, looking at companies who can provide bolt on stands that can literally be taken with us. Getting a 250 seat bolt on stand is a no brainer because it increases the seating to 500, probably slightly increases the capacity, and gives us 250 seats to take to a new venue, that crucially can be added to bit by bit.
_________________
http://twitter.com/Quakerz72fat tony wrote:
As for the opinion expressed about Darlo fans… meh. It’s just the same old thought-averse guff that every other pointing, gawping, Northern League villager with an axe-to-grind / pitchfork-to-shake has cobbled together about us.
fat tony wrote:
When you look into the NCE it does look like a significantly better run organisation than the Royston Vasey Invitational Clown Challenge that we've ended up in.