Advertise Here
You are here: darlofc.co.uk » Board index » The Uncovered Forums » Virtual Feethams
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 4:09 pm View unanswered posts | View active topics



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 7:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:13 am
Posts: 107
Team Supported: Darlington
Just wondering what thought is / has been given to coordinating fundraising events and how you guys as fan groups plan to work together toward common objectives?

Given that the majority of your groups are informal am just curious as to how the 1883 model will shape up in practice?

The Uncovered and 1883 article is IMO fine, you have everyones email address and will put out to vote where required. Will the other groups be adopting similar & consistent approaches or will there be differentials that encourage (compete?) for fan investment?

_________________
@hobartpaving76 on twitter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:14 pm
Posts: 2903
Team Supported: Darlington,(pt Blackburn/harro
Incredibly good question and has been bothering me for the last few days. How does the mission statement of each fan group really differ? how will you avoid duplication of activity. The distinctions between the different groups seem a little hazy other than geography in the case of 2 fan groups. If we had a decent Trust, there would have been a strong case for channelling funds through them as a single umbrella organisation but that is not an option at the moment. How will the functionality of each group differ?

_________________
This empty sanitised shell of a stadium, a cathedral to the vanity and narcissism of one man. It’s very difficult to fall in love with football amongst the rows of empty seats. The notion that a stadium has worth beyond its potential commerical value or it’s proximity to transport links – as a spiritual repository of the hopes,fears and agonies of generations of supporters, or as a physical manifestation of the football club in the community, is a dying one in football (Sam Volkman)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1484
Location: Tbilisi
Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
I reckon we need an escap- sorry, fund-raising committee. I would've thought that Karen would be the best person to head this.

_________________
You Are My Darlo!

we're all in it together!

If you have any nagging questions or concerns contact the CIC direct at contact@darlingtonfc.org and give the directors an opportunity to respond to you.

You can also keep in touch with the CIC on their Facebook page:

http://www.facebook.com/DFCCIC

and you can also use the suggestion box at the retail outlet in the Covered Market.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:51 pm
Posts: 1041
Team Supported: Darlington
princes town wrote:
Incredibly good question and has been bothering me for the last few days. How does the mission statement of each fan group really differ? how will you avoid duplication of activity. The distinctions between the different groups seem a little hazy other than geography in the case of 2 fan groups. If we had a decent Trust, there would have been a strong case for channelling funds through them as a single umbrella organisation but that is not an option at the moment. How will the functionality of each group differ?


I don't think channelling the funds through the 'New' Trust is not an option. Their books are presumamby audited in line with FSA guidlines. I assume we don't have that for Uncovered as we don't need to. To qualify for grants etc do we not need to fund the club in accordance with FSA guidlines? Was that not the whole issue we had with Crowdcube?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 6:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:36 am
Posts: 316
Team Supported: Darlington
I think the question is, is it better to have funds going into 1883 through one channel, or 3/4 different ones?
There will be benefits and concerns for each method.
I think the way to look at this is long term, lets say in 2 years time when 1883 is going strong and CIC is in full swing. Would our club and supporters be better served by one big voice or 4 little ones, i am not sure.
Thoughts anyone?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 9:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:24 pm
Posts: 1656
Team Supported: Darlington
We already have a fundraising working group guys and Karen does head it lol hence why I paid a visit to the forum today

_________________
@Charliejovi on twitter


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], CrazyDarlo, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], lewis1k89 and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group