So you are saying no York player is good enough to play for us just because they are below us in the league.C’mon Pete.Darlo_Pete wrote:Why would we want any York players, when they are below us in the table?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So you are saying no York player is good enough to play for us just because they are below us in the league.C’mon Pete.Darlo_Pete wrote:Why would we want any York players, when they are below us in the table?
Glover and Elliott together are too lightweight, Galbraith is a far better option.divas wrote:Galbraith was out of his depth in the middle a division below. If Wheatley is out it is imperative to play the extra midfielder. Glover/Elliott/Syers would be the pick
We seem very lightweight in midfield, would have put Tez in instead of Glover and a big blow being without Syers and Wheatley.Will do well to get anything out of this game to be honest.JE93 wrote:Syers pulls out in the warm up. Glover takes his place.
Wild rumour or any substance?Seventynine wrote:Steve foster in the running to oust the clueless one ...i said six games
Fantastic result and looking at today’s results, this league is wide open.Roll on Wednesday, cannot wait.lo36789 wrote:Great result - and another great Styche story with him pledging £50 if he scored a hat trick and duly did!
Makes up for the Curzon defeat anyway...
Whoever it is has scored for them.According to tweets, the trialist is having a good game.Darlo_CR wrote:Guess who’s on trial for York tonight..